FiNETIK – Asia and Latin America – Market News Network

Asia and Latin America News Network focusing on Financial Markets, Energy, Environment, Commodity and Risk, Trading and Data Management

Progress Apama and FT India co-operated capital markets technology and trading expansion in India

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS), has announced its expansion into India’s Capital Market through a strategic partnership with Financial Technologies (India) Ltd.

Financial Technologies will market the Progress® Apama® Capital Markets Framework, a set of capabilities for capital markets trading. Based on the Apama Complex Event Processing (CEP) Platform, the Apama Capital Markets Framework includes the Apama Algorithmic Trading Accelerator and the new Apama Risk FirewallTM, which offers support for real-time market risk management within trading applications.

Dr. John Bates, co-founder and general manager of the Apama Division of Progress Software said, “Our partnership with Financial Technologies signifies a key milestone in our expansion in global Capital Markets. In India, the Capital Markets segment is very dynamic and, with the introduction of direct market access almost 12 months ago, an exciting market where new demand is high for sophisticated and advanced trading technologies. Through this partnership, we will be able to leverage Financial Technologies’ well-established access to more than eighty percent of the Indian brokerage and institutional market. We look forward to a long and fruitful relationship with Financial Technologies.”

Dewang Neralla, director, technology of Financial Technologies said, “Technology for the financial markets is going through a rapid shift. With automation in exchanges and order management systems, brokerage houses are in need of automating their order flows for algorithmic trading through complex event processing engines, which can generate orders based on thousands of changing parameters with millisecond latency. We are delighted to partner with Progress® Apama®, a world leader in Complex Event Processing technology. This will complement our portfolio of solutions to brokerage houses, which includes our flagship order management system, ODIN, as well as back-office tools.”

Dr. John Bates continued: “Progress Apama has a significant client base around the world in banks, hedge funds, trading venues and regulators – including firms such as JP Morgan, ING, Bank of China, Deutsche Bank, NYSE Euronext, Turquoise, and the FSA (Financial Services Authority). Apama has demonstrated the power of its CEP platform to empower multi solutions in Algorithmic Trading, Market Aggregation, Market Surveillance, Pricing, and Smart Order Routing through its ‘Solution Accelerators’ model. Our growing customer base is evidence of how our approach is serving the market, and we very much look forward to working with Financial Technologies to take our solutions into the Indian market.”

Source: Automated Trader, 15.06.2009

Filed under: Asia, Exchanges, India, Trading Technology , , , , , , ,

China and Taiwan clamp down on risky wealth management products

China is nipping equity exposure in bank wealth management products, while structured product distribution will be treated with a heavier hand in Taiwan.

Following an announcement last week that the Taiwan Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) is tightening structured product sales, the mainland market is abuzz with talk that the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) intends to clamp down on wealth management products linked to domestic equities and sold through banking channels.

The CBRC is said to be looking to put a stop to banks issuing wealth management products with A-share equities, unlisted shares or underlying funds, with the reason being that banks have exhibited that they are inadequately set up to manage investment risk. Wealth management products with QDII funds as the underlying assets are not expected to be affected at this point.

The banking regulator’s latest measure will follow its high-profile criticism of the banking industry’s wealth management practices issued in April last year, shortly after a delta-one product linked to a Barings Hong Kong fund and structured by UBS tumbled by half in value and liquidated. The incident caused public embarrassment and mass threats of class action lawsuits against its issuer Minsheng Bank.

The banking wealth management business first went live in China in 2005. Only banks have authority to issue wealth management products — a regulatory quip of terms which differ from fund or insurance policies sold through banks. These are targeted towards China’s newly rich, but largely unsophisticated high-net-worth clients, with minimum sales starting at Rmb50,000 ($7,352).

According to the CBRC’s published statistics, in 2008 alone, domestic and foreign banks sold a total of Rmb3.87 trillion ($567.1 billion) worth of renminbi and foreign currency-denominated wealth management products in China. However, at the end of 2008, all outstanding wealth management products were worth a total of Rmb823.3 billion ($120.6 billion).

How-How Zhang, an analyst at Shanghai research house Z-Ben Advisors, notes the CBRC move will be a reconfirmation of its previous stated policies against high-risk products; and should not bode any near-term danger for bank QDII developments.

At the height of the QDII craze in 2007, international fund execs fought to be taken onto banks’ wealth management platforms. A single deal with a bank at the time often translated into a multi-million boon for the fund managers. The trend failed to die off after the Minsheng scandal. Zhang says wealth management products with underlying structured products have since overtaken fund-linked products as the bankers’ preferred choice.

Since April 2008, banks have been forbidden to pass through QDII products as a mere distributor. Instead, they are required to assume the role as principal and be involved in product design and risk assessment — making banks the final party responsible for the products — although offshore fund houses or banks could be taken on as advisors.

In Taiwan, meanwhile, the familiar scene of the one-man day-trip sales exec will thankfully be put to an end with the implementation of a new law that tightens offshore structured product distribution.

Back in 2005 to 2006, when Taiwan was Asia’s hottest market for structured product sales, day-trip sales execs were often seen clearing billion dollars worth of deals by rolling their suitcases in and out of the airport on the same day. It was a sellers’ market. Product selection committees were largely under-formed. Such a person would only need two friends in any organisation: a senior official who sat on the management committee and a general counsel to make a deal happen.

Commercial banks and insurance companies at the time were often comfortable selling products already existing in the markets, and generally chose issuing investment banks based on factors beyond product risks, namely: quality and speed of execution, precision in settlements, quality in legal documentation, speed in secondary market making and customer communication.

Now the FSC will regulate structured products originating outside of Taiwan in two categories — wholesale and retail. Now wholesale investors must demonstrate sufficient risk management abilities, product knowledge and a minimum asset size of NT$30 million ($913,169).

The regulator will now apply multiple checkpoints for structured products intended for retail channels, to bring it on a level playing field with fund products.

On top of distributor’s internal product selection and compliance mechanisms, structured products must now be vetted by respective industry associations in banking, insurance and fund management before they are distributed to retail customers.

A legally responsible party must be installed onshore to distribute structured products from now on, either in the form of a local subsidiary or a master agent, who would have to put up guarantee deposits with the regulator before initiating sales in Taiwan. As creditors, investors hurt by actions of the issuer will be entitled to compensation from the deposit funds.

Also mindful of the final days of the Lehman Brothers’ mini-bond debacle, the FSC is stepping up the availability of liquidity for such products, as subscriptions and redemptions are now required to be published daily, with bidding and asking prices, available units made public to investors. Issuers need to get the central banks’ approval before they remit funds into and out of Taiwan.

The FSC will advise little beyond prudence and self-discipline for wholesale investors, hoping industry players will have the ability to self-assess and regulate.

Source:AsianInvestor.net, 30.06.2009 read article here

Filed under: Asia, Banking, China, News, Risk Management, Services, Wealth Management , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Market Data Platforms: Infrastructur to Handel Data Challanges – Report by A-TEAM July 2009

An exponential expansion of market data volumes in recent years has been caused by the confluence of a number of technology and business drivers – from the emergence of electronic communication networks (ECNs) to the advent of smart order routing systems and algorithmic trading engines.

Download:MARKET_DATA_PLATFORMS_Infrastructure_to_Handle_Your_Data_Challenges

Coupled with the increasingly divergent data sets needed to support complex decision systems, there is now a requirement for high performance data management infrastructures throughout the enterprise supporting high frequency automated trading as well as traditional market data processing functions like securities master file updates, risk analysis, and back-office trade support. Read full article

Source: A-Team and NYSE Technology, 30.06.2009

Filed under: Data Management, Library, Market Data, News, Reference Data , , , , , , , , , , ,

Credit Card Crisis: Banks rush to emergency rescue of credit card trusts/securitisation vehicles

Credit card issuers have had to resort to extreme measures to keep their businesses alive as US consumers buckle under the weight of the recession. Record credit card losses are pushing big US banks to come to the rescue of off-balance sheet vehicles they use to transform hundreds of billions of dollars in consumer loans into securities sold to investors.

The support provided by Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and American Express underscores how the deteriorating health of the US consumer is opening new fronts in the financial crisis.

Losses on US credit cards as measured by Moody’s Credit Card Index rose beyond 10 per cent of total loans outstanding in May, a new high in the 20-year history of the index and the sixth consecutive monthly record.
Most credit card loans are placed into pools – structured as trusts – that are used to back bonds sold to investors. Banks rely on such “securitisations” to fund their huge levels of credit card lending while keeping most of the risk off their books.

Although they are not obligated to support the pools of credit card receivables when losses mount, banks have done so to ensure investors continue to buy such securities.

The doomsday scenario facing banks is that credit card losses will rise to levels that force the vehicles to repay bondholders early.

Banks have been supporting card trusts by issuing – and then buying – bonds that would absorb the first layer of losses in the underlying loans. This is designed to provide a protective buffer for existing bondholders.

BofA bought $8.5bn of junior debt from one of its trusts in the first quarter and put aside $750m to cover losses on the investment.

Citi bought $265m of so-called junior debt from one of its credit card trusts in October and an additional $2.3bn of junior debt from the same trust in April, according to a regulatory filing. JPMorgan and Amex also have issued new junior debt for their credit card trusts.

In addition, JPMorgan has supported credit card bonds issued by Washington Mutual – the troubled lender bought by JPMorgan last year – by substituting its own credit card loans for WaMu’s lower quality ones.

The loss rate on the WaMu pool was 14.8 per cent in October. By comparison, a JPMorgan credit-card pool had an 8.1 per cent loss rate in May.

Source: Financial Times, 24.06.2009 by Saskia Scholtes and Francesco Guerrera in New York

Filed under: Banking, News, Risk Management, Services , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fund Managers can become farmers: Jim Rogers Interview Economic Times of India

At one stage we were inundated with gloomy forecasts, which were further reinforced by the IMF and World Bank. And then suddenly stocks surged — something most were not prepared for. How risky is the market today?

Central banks all over the world have printed huge amounts of money, and the real economy is not strong enough for all this money to be absorbed… so, it’s going into stocks and real assets such as commodities. It’s a mistake what they are doing. It’s giving short-term pleasure, but there’s long-term pain as we are going to have much higher inflation, much higher interest rates and a worse economy down the road.

The American bond market is already beginning to go down dramatically as people realise that the American government has to sell huge amount of bonds, and secondly, there is going to be inflation, serious inflation, as it was always in the past when you had governments printing huge amounts of money.

Stocks are rising even as fiscal deficit is widening. Somewhere it has to snap…

It’s going to snap. Later this year, next year, we are going to have currency problems, maybe even a currency crisis. I don’t know with which currency — maybe with the pound sterling, maybe with the US dollar, who knows. It maybe with something none of us have at the moment. When you have a currency crisis, stocks will be affected, many things will be affected. It is not sound, what’s happening out there in the world.

In the 1930s, we had a huge stock market bubble which popped. And then politicians started making many mistakes. They became protectionist. They made solvent banks take over insolvent banks and then both banks failed in the end.

They are doing many of the same mistakes now. What’s different this time is that we are printing huge amounts of money which they did not print at that time. So, we are going to have inflation this time.

What do you do? No politically-elected government can afford so much pain, unemployment and hardships…

America could have. America just had an election. The guy was elected in November and he could have come in the beginning of a four-year term and said the guys before me were hopeless idiots. They ruined things. We have to solve this problem. We have to take some pains now. But don’t worry, we will get through this pain, and in two to three years or four years, things would be fine. And he could have been re-elected.

If the pain comes in 2010, 2011 or 2012, there will be nobody he can blame. Especially, if things go bad later, the opposition will say, wait a minute, 2009 looked good. The next guy is going to say you did it… But you are right. It’s very difficult for an elected government. You have a newly-elected government in India. Whenever you have a new government they can take some of the pain.

You recently said that you would invest in China and Sri Lanka but not in India. Aren’t you betting on the new government in India?

I was trying to make a point that if anyone wants to invest in this particular part of the world, the best place would be Sri Lanka. Because it looks like the 30-year war is coming to an end.

Throughout history, if you go to a place after the war ends you usually find everything as very cheap, everyone is demoralised, people are just depressed and there are enormous opportunities if you have energy.

In my view, investing in Sri Lanka in May 2009 is probably a better bet than Pakistan, Bangladesh, India or some of the other countries nearby. Let’s hope the new Indian government does something. I have heard wonderful things from Indian politicians for 40 years.

And rarely do they produce. It’s not the first time that the Congress party has been in the power. If they mean it, India’s going to be one of the greatest development stories in the next 20 years. But I don’t know if they mean it.

What kind of reforms?

Why isn’t the currency convertible, why isn’t foreign capital encouraged, why isn’t foreign expertise encouraged, why is it so protectionist? Why are farmers only allowed to own five hectares? India should be the greatest farming nation in the world. You have the soil, the weather, you have everything and yet an Indian farmer can own only five hectares.

How can an Indian farmer compete with a guy in Ireland who can own 1,000 hectares or a guy in Brazil who can own 5,000 hectares? Smart people don’t become farmers. Because what’s the future? Whenever prices start going up, Indian politicians ban futures trading, as if futures trading makes prices go up. It’s the craziest and the most absurd thing in the whole world. Prices go up because there is a reason for prices to go up.

Last year you were buying only Chinese stocks. Why?

The market collapsed in October-November. That’s when I bought more Chinese shares. I have not bought any Chinese shares since then. I have not bought shares anywhere in the world since then. My way of participating in what’s going on now is to buy commodities.

In my view, commodities are the only place where fundamentals are improving. Farmers can’t get loans for fertilisers now, even though inventories of food are the lowest in decades. Nobody can get a loan to open a mine. So, you will have supplies of everything continuing to decline.

What else are you looking at while investing?

There are some industries in India that would do exceedingly well in the next few years, one of which is water. You have a horrible water problem. China also has a horrible water problem. So, I bought water companies in China. There are some great opportunities if America falls off the face of the earth. China is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to solve the agricultural problem.

So, I am buying agricultural stocks and water stocks in China. There are other industries in India which have a great future. I am very bullish on Indian tourism. Wherever I go for speeches around the world I tell people, if you have to go to one country in your lifetime, you should go to India.

Your government is going to re-build the military, they say. So, there’s going to be great opportunities here. Also, they may build the infrastructure. So, I see many opportunities in India.

The possibility of a sovereign default in the developed world could further depress sentiments. You think it’s possible?

In 1918, the UK was the richest and the most powerful country in the world. Within one generation it was in shambles, within two-and-a-half generations it defaulted. The UK defaulted in 1970s and had to be bailed out by the IMF. Many of the countries in the developed world are in serious trouble right now.

Iceland has already defaulted. I think there could be a currency crisis because of sovereign debt problems later this year, next year or 2011. Developed nations have defaulted before. Remember the Asian crisis. It was a default of one kind or the other. It has happened before and it will happen again.

Are you worried about any particular market or region?

I am glad that I have no investments in the UK. Neither long, nor short. I am convinced that it’s in trouble. I am worried about the US. I have sold nearly all of my US dollars. I always had some as I am an American citizen. But I see serious problems developing there. Those two of the big developed countries are the ones that I see with the most likely problems.

But the problem is that it never works that way. Everybody is sitting here watching the UK and US and it may happen in say Portugal or some place we haven’t thought of and it will come suddenly to surprise us all.

If US unemployment touches the 10%-mark, it would further impact retail sales. How bad could this be for Asia?

Let’s pick on China for a minute. If you sell to Wal-Mart in the US and if you are a Chinese supplier you know there is a problem. And you are going to be suffering. Any company that deals with the West is going to have problems. On the other hand, companies that are in the water-treatment business in Asia will care less if the West disappears. They are too busy making money, too busy going to work everyday.

What kind of commodities will smart money chase? Can money be made in crude?

I own gold but think silver is better right now. Natural gas is cheaper than oil right now, but I own them all. If you want to buy crude, you should probably buy cotton. Because all farmers in the US are planting corn to turn into energy. That means they are not going to plant any cotton. The best way to play crude oil is to buy cotton.

Right now, there are huge subsidies around the world for farmers to plant corn, maize, for instance, so that they can be converted into energy. If energy prices go higher, there will be even more of that.

If everybody plants his fields with soya, corn or palm oil to turn it into oil or energy then no one is going to plant cotton.

And you can make a lot more money in cotton than oil. Between oil and gold, buy cotton. Between oil and gold buy silver. The other way to invest in oil is to buy sugar as everybody is converting a lot of sugar into energy.
Silver is so much cheaper on a historic basis. And gold is near its all-time high. Silver is 75% below its all-time high. So, I would suspect that silver and cotton are going to do better than gold and oil.

Global population is close to its peak and genetically-modified crops will increase productivity. What makes you so bullish on agriculture?

It doesn’t matter. The world has been consuming more than it produced. Food inventories are at a multi-decade low. And we haven’t had any bad weather. We had isolated cases of droughts and things. That may never happen again. But if it does, the prices of food would go through the roof.

If there is climate change taking place, the best way to participate is through agriculture or through agriculture products. There are many positive things happening. Right now, there is a shortage of everything in agriculture — seeds, fertilisers, tractors, tractor tyres. We have a shortage of farmers because farming has been a horrible business for the past 30 years.

What kind of a market are you witnessing now?

Jim Rogers

It’s a bear market rally. I was going to say I don’t think S&P 500 will see new highs. But I have to quickly temper that by saying against the dollar because the S&P 500 could triple from here if they print enough money and the value of the US dollar collapses, then S&P could go to 50,000, Dow Jones can go to 1,00,000.

Which is one reason why I am not shorting stocks right now. Because there is a possibility of this sort of a thing. There is a possibility that stocks could go through unheard of levels, but would be in worthless currency.

That naturally brings us to the debate on a new international reserve currency

Several countries have raised the issue once again. The US dollar is terribly flawed right now. Something has to be done to the US dollar and something will be done just as something was done about the pound sterling. After World War II, people stopped using the pound sterling and converted to the dollar for many reasons. Something’s going to be done about the dollar.

We are much closer to be doing something about it or will be forced to do something about it. India was forced to change in 1991 and the world will be forced to change the currency situation in the foreseeable future.

There is already an underlying fear that this mountain of cash will chase assets and eventually force central banks to mop up liquidity. How do you think this would play out?

I know they all say, ‘Don’t worry, we will reverse gears and take the excess liquidity out in time.’ I don’t believe them for a minute. No one has ever done it that way. When central bankers started trying to, it caused so much pain that they quickly reversed or have got rid of that central banker and put somebody else in.

I just don’t think they could do it. That’s why I am worried about the bond market and the inflation. If all central banks do it together, that’s going to lead to higher unemployment, riots in the streets, civil unrests.

Your track record as an investor has been more than impressive. But in todays market can you replicate your performance of the past 20 years?

One can. I probably cannot as I am not spending enough time at it. But it can be done. There are going to be people who we will read about in 20 years having made legendary fortunes starting now. In the 1930s, there were people who built huge fortunes and laid the foundations like Templeton.

He started in the 1930s. He saw opportunities and took advantage. These are people who saw great advantages and opportunities in the 1930s, acted and became fantastic successes. There may be somebody out there now. I don’t know who she is. Maybe she is in Brazil, China or India.

What will you tell a confused fund manager who seeks your advice?

Become a farmer. The world has tens of thousands of hotshot fund managers right now. If I am correct, the financial community is not going to be a great place to be in for the next 30 years. We have many periods in history when financial people were in charge, we had many periods when people who produced real goods were in charge — miners, farmers, etc.

The world, in my view, is changing and is shifting away from the financial types to producers of real goods, and this is going to last for several decades as it always has. This may sound strange but it always happens this way. Ten years from now, it may be farmers who will drive the Lamborghinis and the stock brokers will drive tractors or taxis at best.

Source: Economic Times, 04.06.2009

Filed under: Asia, Banking, Brazil, China, Energy & Environment, Exchanges, India, Latin America, News, Risk Management , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HNWI: The world’s rich part with $7.9 trillion in assets – CapGemini Merrill Lynch Wealth Report 2009

The global financial crisis has caused the assets of the world’s high-net-worth individuals to fall by an unprecedented 19.5% to $32.8 trillion.

Download: Capgemini Merrill Lynch 2009_World_Wealth_Report

Everyone knows 2008 was an extremely tough year, with the global financial crisis shaving off hundreds of billions of dollars in global wealth. The latest World Wealth Report attempts to measure those losses, at least for the world’s richer population which bore the brunt of the impact of the crisis.

The wealth of the world’s high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) fell by 19.5% to $32.8 trillion in 2008 from $40.7 trillion in 2007. That’s an unprecedented decline in HNWI assets in the 13 years that Merrill Lynch and consulting firm Capgemini have collaborated on this report. All regions suffered losses in HNWI assets, with North America (down 22.8%), Asia Pacific (down 22.3%), and Europe (down 21.9%) leading the decline. The US remains the single largest home to HNWIs, with a population of 2.46 million in 2008 (down from 3.019 million in 2007).

Also a record is the 14.2% drop in the population of HNWIs worldwide to 8.6 million in 2008 from 10.1 million in 2007. North America also suffered the most in terms of the number of people that fell off the rich list (down 19%), followed by Europe (down 14.4%) and Acsia (down 14.2%). The fate of the ultra-rich was much worse, with their population down by 24.6%.

Stock market losses were largely responsible for the loss of wealth. Although HNWIs have a diversified portfolio that includes financial assets from property to art, the bulk of their wealth has been diverted to equities over the past years. Global stock market capitalisation plunged 49% to $32.6 trillion in 2008 from a historic high of $63.4 trillion, which is a flashback to levels last reached in 2003.

Valuations of equities “turned from challenging to extremely distressing” in 2008 and how share prices perform from here on will have a major effect on wealth trends because the relationship between HNWIs and stock markets is “very correlated”, says Francis Liu, market managing director for Greater China at Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management.

This latest report brings the HNWI asset and population levels back to their end-2005 levels, virtually wiping out any collective gains made in 2006 and 2007 when stock markets worldwide were mostly in a state of delirium over their extended rallies. Merrill Lynch defines HNWIs as those with net assets of at least $1 million (excluding primary residences and consumables) and ultra HNWIs as those with net assets of at least $30 million.

There are two things to note with this report.

First, despite expectations of continued volatility in stock markets worldwide — which is clearly the main source of wealth of the people that fall within this elite bracket — and despite the fact that no one has a crystal ball that can predict exactly how the global economy will recover from the crisis, Merrill Lynch and Capgemini are confident that HNWI assets will grow by 48% to $48.5 trillion by 2013, which translates to a projected annual growth rate of 8.1%.

Second, there is the question of how accurate the findings are to begin with. They are, after all, based mainly on best estimates using publicly available data. The methodology starts with a macro look at the total wealth of a country before making assumptions on a micro level. So while the figures presented in the World Wealth Report reflect an earnest attempt to show a picture of the assets and population of the world’s HNWIs, they could very well be an under-representation of what’s actually out there. The report notes, for example, that China had 364,000 HNWIs in 2008 (down from 413,000 in 2007). Does that reinstate the belief that only a minority of China’s more than one billion population hold the key to the nation’s wealth; or is it an inability to capture the value of the wealth that’s out there?

Liu points to previous growth figures to back-up the 2013 forecast. He notes that HNWI assets grew by around 8% to 9% from 2002 to 2007 even with the financial problems during that time. Clearly optimistic about the future, he expects the five-year period from 2008 to even things out.

North America (mainly the US) and Asia-Pacific (mainly China) are expected to lead the growth in HNWI assets and population over the next five years, backed by expectations of higher US consumer spending and an increased autonomy of the consumer-led mainland economy. Asia-Pacific is expected to overtake North America in terms of HNWI assets by 2013, thanks in large part to China’s relatively robust growth.

With regard to the quality of the data, Liu concedes that the HNWI asset and population figures used in the World Wealth report are likely “conservative” and “understated”, but when used consistently over the past 13 years, still paint a pretty good picture in terms of growth trends.

Wealth trends in Asia

Looking specifically at Asia, the region’s HNWI assets fell 22.3% to $8.3 trillion in 2008 from $10.7 trillion in 2007. Its HNWI population fell 14.2% to 2.4 million from 2.8 million.

Still highly dependent on exports, Asia was also severely affected by the crisis as global demand for products dried up, particularly towards the end of 2008.

In terms of the stock market, those with the largest gains in the region in 2007 led the losses in 2008. China’s market capitalisation was down 60% in 2008 after a surge of 291% in 2007, while India’s was down 64% in 2008 after jumping 118% in 2007.

Merrill Lynch and Capgemini declined to reveal the complete details relevant to Asia, opting to reveal the full report on the region’s wealthy individuals separately in October.

However, snippets of information reveal that China — with its 364,000 in HNWIs — has overtaken the United Kingdom as the fourth highest ranking market worldwide in terms of HNWI population. This marks another step up for China, which overtook France in the rankings in 2007. Japan, with a HNWI population of 1.366 million, is still firmly second to the US.

Hong Kong and India suffered the most in terms of the number of people who can no longer call themselves US dollar millionaires. The HNWI population fell by a whopping 61.3% in Hong Kong to 37,000 in 2008 from 96,000 in 2007, and by 31.6% in India to 84,000 in 2008 from 123,000 in 2007.

Hong Kong’s poor showing in this year’s report can be explained by the 50% fall in stock market capitalisation and the 12.6% average decline in property prices in 2008. Add to that the fact that the majority of Hong Kong’s HNWIs just barely made it to the list to begin with, as many of them fell in the $1 million to $5 million range. Being borderline HNWIs meant that last year’s stock market losses were enough to change their overall fortunes.

Like Liu, Stephen Corry, Asia-Pacific investment strategist at Merrill Lynch Global management, also prefers to look at the bright side. He notes that investor sentiment has already improved, with the Hang Seng Index up 27% so far this year and property prices recovering somewhat thanks to low interest rates and higher liquidity. Another thing in Hong Kong’s favour is its role as a conduit for investors interested in gaining exposure to the China market.

India also suffered from a hefty drop in stock market capitalisation (it was down 64.1% in 2008) and a steep decline in demand for its goods and services.

Japan, which accounts for more than 50% of the HNWI population in Asia-Pacific, suffered a relatively mild 9.9% decline in HNWI population. Japan’s relative resilience has to do with the fact that the rich list has grown that much over the past two years and the individual asset levels are higher compared with other markets, allowing the Japanese to survive stock market losses better than most in the region.

In terms of asset allocation in Asia and worldwide, wealthy individuals took cover in fixed-income and cash-based investments, making up 50% of overall portfolios of HNWIs in 2008. HNWIs also retreated to home markets, going back to investments they were familiar with and had more confidence in. They also returned to real estate, with this asset class making up 18% of overall portfolios of HNWIs in 2008.

Impact on wealth management industry

The global financial crisis has most certainly taken its toll on the wealth management industry. It has shaken the trust and confidence that HNWIs previously placed on markets, regulators, financial institutions and even the principle of portfolio management, according to Capgemini.

“Mainly due to the loss of trust and confidence, more than 25% of HNW clients surveyed withdrew their assets from a wealth management firm or completely switched over to another firm in 2008,” says Arvind Sundaresan, head of sales for Asia-Pacific at Capgemini Hong Kong.

Sundaresan says the switching trend was more prevalent among individuals below the age of 45 as well as those who earned their wealth rather than inherited it.

To prevent client attrition and strengthen retention, Capgemini says financial advisors and wealth management firms must pursue more open and transparent client communications, provide more risk-related information, and improve client services.

Source: FinanceAsia.com. 26.06.2009 by Rita Raags De Ramos

Filed under: Asia, Banking, Library, News, Services, Wealth Management , , , , , , , ,

Inching Toward Dark Pool “Reporting Standards”

Last week Goldman Sachs Electronic Trading told clients it would begin reporting volume executed in Sigma X, its dark pool, based on single-counted matched executions. This is a departure from how Goldman has been calculating Sigma X volume. Dark pool operators generally are now mulling their options after the Securities and Exchange Commission expressed concern over the lack of reporting standards. See original article here.

FiNETIK recommends:

“Without an absolute industry protocol, we’re advocating doing what exchanges have been doing for a very long time: reporting single-counted matched-only volume,” said Dave Johnsen, vice president for Sigma X business development at Goldman. “If everyone else puts themselves on the same metric, the dark-pool numbers will add up to 100 percent of dark-pool volume.”

Goldman is doing this in part because the SEC recently made noises about wanting more information about how much volume is occurring in dark pools and where that volume is executing. Dark pools are not required to publish this information publicly, although they must print their trades to trade reporting facilities. There is no standard for how dark pools calculate this off-board volume when they issue volume figures.

The SEC’s worry is that this lack of information could impact investors’ execution decisions and impair transparency in the market as dark liquidity grows. SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said last week that the Commission has heard “concerns from market participants that the lack of post-trade transparency by dark pools makes it difficult, if not impossible, for the public to assess dark pool trading and to identify pools that are most active in particular stocks.”

Dark pools accounted for 8.7 percent of consolidated volume in April, compared with roughly 5 percent in early 2008, according to institutional broker Rosenblatt Securities. May figures were not available.

But while Goldman is interested in seeing the industry adopt a uniform reporting methodology, it has not committed to publishing its volume figures publicly every month. Johnsen emphasizes that there should be industry discussion and customer feedback about various alternatives and the degree of information that could be provided publicly, including monthly volumes.

The SEC is particularly concerned about the lack of a uniform reporting methodology for dark pools. James Brigagliano, co-acting director of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, said in a speech last month that dark pools “do not use a uniform methodology and may effectively overstate their true executed volume because of double counting…or by including ‘touched’ volume of orders routed elsewhere for execution with the ‘matched’ volume that they actually execute.” Most dark pools double-count their volume, unlike exchanges, which single-count matched trades.

Matched volume is volume executed internally within the ATS by customers. Touched, or handled, volume includes orders routed to other non-displayed venues for executions. That handled volume may be claimed and tallied by more than one firm. “Including handled volume could inflate a dark pool’s numbers,” said Adam Sussman, director of research at TABB Group. Goldman’s Johnsen stresses that ATS volume should exclude that handled flow.

Referring to the potential usefulness of “some form of improved post-trade transparency,” the SEC’s Brigagliano said that “uniform and reliable trade reporting practices could help establish a fairer playing field because those dark pools that report their volume accurately would not be disadvantaged in comparison with any that might inflate their volume.”

Brigagliano did not say how that transparency might be achieved. According to industry participants, one option could be for the SEC or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority to require ATS venues that do not publish quotes to provide more transparency around their individual prints, identifying them as dark pool trades rather than merely off-board executions printed to a TRF. Another option could be to identify the individual ATS that printed the trade. Regulators could also mandate that ATSs publicly provide aggregate volume statistics, with or without additional information such as the top names traded in each dark pool or the level of price improvement received in those pools. In addition, the industry could voluntarily move toward a standard.

More transparency around executions in dark pools is a good idea, said TABB’s Sussman. He notes that dark pools currently are not obligated to report any volume information publicly. Institutions and brokers, however, need to know how much volume particular pools are executing. “If an institutional client sees that a destination it doesn’t access is increasing its market share, it can connect to that pool or make sure its broker is accessing the destination,” Sussman said. “Understanding market share statistics is critical to getting best execution and to ensuring that a firm is accessing the right destinations for its order flow and execution needs.”

Two firms that have attempted to provide some transparency around dark pool executions are TABB and Rosenblatt Securities. TABB began publishing its Liquidity Matrix in spring 2007, while Rosenblatt launched “Let There Be Light,” its volume breakdown and analysis of dark pool trends in February 2008.

Although many dark pool operators provide some minimal public volume statistics, most provide their clients with much more information. GSET, for instance, gives customers end-of-day reports about their Sigma X and dark pool executions, including execution-quality statistics about their order flow that traded in Sigma X. Johnsen said this information includes the percentage of the spread the customer captured and the amount of price improvement the customer received relative to particular algorithmic benchmarks. This is useful, he said, to traders executing large orders through algos. GSET also provides a real-time account of where customers are getting dark pool executions through Goldman. Sigma X, one of the industry’s largest dark pools, matched a daily average of 123 million shares in May (single-counted).

Credit Suisse, LeveL ATS and other dark pools have no plans to follow Goldman’s lead in how they report their volume, but many firms thinks a single methodology to account for executed volume would be good. Dan Mathisson, head of Advanced Execution Services at Credit Suisse, said his firm isn’t concerned about whether volume is single-counted or double-counted. “We want our numbers to be comparable to the numbers at other dark pools,” he said. “Which methodology is used isn’t important, but it’d be nice if everybody didn’t have a different methodology.”

Mathisson notes that handled volume should not be included in matched market share reported by dark pools. “It’s relevant to see how much flow is passing through a pool, but handled isn’t matched,” he said. CrossFinder matched a daily average of 148 million shares (single-counted) in May, making it the largest pool for a bulge-bracket firm.

One of the industry’s biggest pools is GETCO Execution Services, the only ATS venue that already single-counts its matched executions. GES is a separate broker-dealer owned by the parent of market-making firm GETCO. Launched in March 2008, the ATS executes subscriber flow, including orders from retail brokerages, against flow sent into GES by GETCO’s market-making business.

Knight Link, an electronic dark liquidity product that enables brokers to execute against flow from the market-making division within Knight Capital Markets, single-counts that flow since it tallies only customer executions. The broker-dealer does not report volume for Knight Match, its traditional dark pool. Jamil Nazarali, head of electronic trading at Knight Capital Group, noted that “Knight supports a common standard for reporting trade volumes to make it possible to compare venues.”

Whit Conary, president of LeveL ATS, a dark pool owned by five broker-dealers, agrees with Credit Suisse’s approach to a reporting methodology. “The issue isn’t double-counting,” he said. “It’s transparency. Customers make routing decisions based on the information they get from venues. That information can’t be confusing and must be accurate.” He thinks dark pools “should all be on the same page” in how they report their volume.

Both Credit Suisse and LeveL think real-time identification of where dark pool prints are occurring would be counter-productive. In Mathisson’s view, that type of information could lead to slippage. “I wouldn’t want hedge funds or others to sniff out patterns,” he said. Mathisson pointed out that if a fund, for instance, sees three prints in a row at increasing prices in a particular ATS, its models could show that the stock is likely to go up X basis points over the next two days. “If ATS data were released and identified in real time, firms would trawl through the data to find patterns and that could hurt the institutions that use those dark pools,” he observed. “More disclosure in that case wouldn’t be a good thing for institutional clients.”

Conary, too, sees real-time information as potential information leakage. “Post-trade transparency is critical, but real time almost gets you away from the purpose of being a dark pool,” he said. Still, the level of disclosure LeveL is comfortable with may not work for other pools. On its web site, LeveL publishes a list of the highest-volume stocks executed in LeveL on a one-day-delayed basis. The pool publishes a monthly report with aggregate execution-quality statistics that is also publicly available. The majority of other pools don’t make similar information available to the public.

However, even these numbers from LeveL could add some confusion to those looking at the information in a cursory way. The ATS currently double-counts its aggregate volume, in line with the practice at other dark pools, but single-counts its executions in individual stocks on its web site. It does this so traders or quants can make apples-to-apples comparisons of its executed volume in specific names to volume traded in the displayed markets.

With the SEC discussing the importance of post-trade transparency, the issue of what type of post-trade information should be made available, and its frequency, has become an exceedingly thorny subject. Justin Schack, vice president for market structure analysis at Rosenblatt, points out that dark pools may have different views about this based on their business model, their clients and the sensitivity of the flow they execute.

“I think not many people would see a problem with having an identifier that says ‘this print is a dark pool trade,’” Schack said. “But identifying the particular dark pool would be problematic for those pools concerned about information leakage and gaming, particularly if it’s a large print in a thinly traded stock.”  He added that there’s a broad industry assumption that people should know where liquidity is in the market, including at dark pools. “But if that information is available on a weekly or monthly basis, that’s less valuable than if it were available on a daily basis,” Schack said.

Credit Suisse suggests another post-trade reporting option. Regulators, according to Mathisson, could require a centralized reporting database for ATS volume executed by non-displayed markets. He said this could be akin to the program trading stats that exchanges publish.

Mathisson said designating dark-pool volume on a weekly or monthly basis with a time delay “would be healthy.” Firms could then see which ATSs have volume, based on a standard reporting methodology. Whether such a database could include additional information about specific stocks or execution quality at dark pools could be discussed by industry participants, he said.

Source: TradersMagazine.com, 26.06.2009 by Nina Metha

Filed under: Data Management, Market Data, News, Reference Data, Services, Standards, Trading Technology , , , , , ,

HKEx Publishes Consultation Paper On Certified Emission Reduction Futures

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEx) today (Friday) published a consultation paper on certified emission reduction (CER) futures.

The consultation paper seeks views and comments from all individuals and organisations interested in emissions markets, including financial intermediaries, investors, Clean Development Mechanism project participants and public policy makers, on the business feasibility of developing an emissions trading platform in Hong Kong and CER futures as a product concept.

The consultation paper includes:

  • An overview of the development of carbon trading around the world;
  • A potential design for CER futures which may be suitable for exchange trading in Hong Kong;
  • Some comments and views shared by emission market players in Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and the UK who met with HKEx executives for informal discussions of CER futures contract specifications; and
  • Six questions for potential respondents’ consideration.

Some of the questions cover specifics, while others are relatively broad.  For instance, Question 5 invites explanations of any issues related to the introduction of CER futures not mentioned in the consultation paper that HKEx ought to consider, and Question 6 seeks comments on the overall development of emissions or pollutants trading markets in Hong Kong.

“We encourage everyone interested in this topic to read our consultation paper and submit their views, and we welcome any information on the development of the carbon emissions markets that people think may be useful to us,” said Calvin Tai, Head of HKEx’s Derivatives Market.

“We hope our Exchange and Clearing Participants will share their insight on the likely demand for CER futures trading in our market at this time,” Mr Tai added.

The consultation paper and questionnaire are posted on the HKEx website.

The deadline for the submission of comments is 31 August 2009.

Source: MondoVisione, 26.06.2009

Filed under: Asia, Energy & Environment, Exchanges, Hong Kong, Library, News , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Data Quality – Understanding and Managment Commitment

This column  will allow you to take the message to management because without, first their understanding and then their commitment, nothing will happen of any significance. I’ve tossed in a couple of points on the cost of poor quality that should capture their attention.

What Is Data Quality?

There are a number of indicators of quality data.

  1. The Data Is Accurate – This means a customer’ name is spelled correctly and the address is correct.  If the Marketing Department doesn’t have the correct profile for the customer, Marketing will attempt to sell them the wrong products and present a disorganized image of the organization.  When data on a company vehicle is entered into the system, it may be valid (a vehicle number that is in the database), but it may be inaccurate (the wrong vehicle number).
  2. The Data Is Stored According To Its Data Types
  3. The Data Has Integrity – The data will not be accidentally destroyed or altered.  Updates will not be lost due to conflicts among concurrent users. Much of this is the responsibility of the DBMS, but proper implementation of the DBMS should not be assumed.  Robust backup and recovery procedures as implemented by the installation are needed to maintain some levels of integrity.  In addition, operational procedures that restrict a batch update from being run twice are also necessary.
  4. The Data Is Consistent – The form and content of the data should be consistent.  This allows for data to be integrated and to be shared by multiple departments across multiple applications and multiple platforms.
  5. The Databases Are Well Designed – A well designed database will perform satisfactorily for its intended applications, it is extendible, and it exploits the integrity capabilities of its DBMS.
  6. The Data Is Not Redundant – In actual practice, no organization has ever totally eliminated redundant data.  In most data warehouse implementations, the data warehouse data is partially redundant with operational data.  For certain performance reasons, and in some distributed environments, an organization may correctly choose to maintain data in more than one place and also maintain the data in more than one form.

The redundant data to be minimized is the data that has been duplicated for none of the reasons stated above but because:

  • The creator of the redundant data was unaware of the existence of available data.
  • The redundant data was created because the availability or performance characteristics of the primary data were unacceptable to the new system. This may be a legitimate reason or it may also be that the performance problem could have been successfully addressed with a new index or a minor tuning effort and that availability could have been improved by better operating procedures.
  • The owner of the primary data would not allow the new developer to view or update the data.
  • The lack of control mechanisms for data update indicated the need for a new version of the data.
  • The lack of security controls dictated the need for a redundant subset of the primary data.

In these cases, redundant data is only the symptom and not the cause of the problem.  Only managerial vision, direction, and a robust data strategy would lead to an environment with less redundant data.

  1. The Data Follows Business Rules - As an example, a loan balance may never be a negative number.  This rule comes from the business side and IT is required to establish the edits to be sure the rule is not violated.
  2. The Data Corresponds To Established Domains - These domains are specified by the owners or users of the data.  The domain would be the set of allowable values or a specified range of values.  In a Human Resource System, the domain of sex is limited to “Male” and “Female.”  “Biyearly” may be accurate but still not an allowable value.
  3. The Data Is Timely - Timeliness is subjective and can only be determined by the users of the data.  The users will specify that monthly, weekly, daily, or real-time data is required.  Real-time data is often a requirement of production systems with on-line-transaction processing (OLTP).  If monthly is all that is required and monthly is delivered, the data is timely.
  4. The Data Is Well Understood - It does no good to have accurate and timely data if the users don’t know what it means.  Naming standards are a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for well-understood data.Data can be documented in the Data Dictionary/Repository, but the creation and validation of the definitions is a time consuming and tedious process. This is, however, time and effort well spent.  Without clear definitions and understanding, the organization will exhaust countless hours trying to determine the meaning of their reports or draw incorrect conclusions from the data displayed on the screens.
  5. The Data Is Integrated - An insurance company needs both agent data and policyholder data.  These are typically two files, databases, or tables that may have no IT connection.  If the data is integrated, meaningful business information can be readily generated from a combination of both the agent and policyholder data.  Database integration generally requires the use of a common DBMS. There is an expectation (often unfulfilled) that all applications using the DBMS will be able to easily access any data residing on the DBMS.  An integrated database would be accessible from a number of applications.  Many different programs in multiple systems could access and, in a controlled manner, update the database.

    Database integration requires the knowledge of the characteristics of the data, what the data means, and where the data resides.  This information would be kept in the Data Dictionary/Repository.

An integrated database would have the following potential benefits:

  • Less redundant data
  • Fewer possibilities for data inconsistency
  • Fewer interface programs (a major resource consumer)
  • Fewer problems with timing discrepancies
  • More timely data
  1. The Data Satisfies The Needs Of The Business – The data has value to the enterprise.  High quality data is useless if it’s not the data needed to run the business.  Marketing needs data on customers and demographic data, Accounts Payable needs data on vendors and product information.
  2. The User Is Satisfied With The Quality Of The Data And The Information Derived From That Data – While this is a subjective measure, it is, arguably, the most important indicator of all.  If the data is of high quality, but the user is still dissatisfied, you or your boss will be out of a job.
  3. The Data Is Complete –
  4. There Are No Duplicate Records - A mailing list would carry a subscriber, potential buyer, or charity benefactor only once.  You will only receive one letter that gives you the good news that “You may already be a winner!”
  5. Data Anomalies - From the perspective of IT, this may be the worst type of data contamination.  A data anomaly occurs when a data field defined for one purpose is used for another.  For example, a currently unused, but defined field is used for some purpose totally unrelated to its original intent.  A clever programmer may put a negative value in this field (which is always supposed to be positive) as a switch.

Design Reviews

An important set of information to be included in design reviews is the requisite quality of the data under consideration and the actual state of the data.  The basic question to be asked is “How clean, timely, etc. must the data be?”  In the design review, the team members would consider the data source, the process of update and delete, and the quality controls imposed on those accessing the data.

The Design Review would review and validate that standards are being followed. The review process may make recommendations to clean up the data, establish strict controls on shared updating, and assure sufficient training for users who would query the data.

Assessment Of Existing Data Quality

As people overestimate the intelligence of their grandchildren and the sweet nature of their dogs, organizations overestimate the quality of their own data.  A reality check is generally needed.  Poor quality data can be detected in a number of ways:

  • Programs that abnormally terminate with data exceptions.
  • Clients who experience errors or anomalies in their reports and transactions and/or don’t trust their reports or don’t trust the data displayed on their screens.
  • Clients who don’t know or are confused about what the data actually means.
  • On-line inquiry transactions and reports that are useless because the data is old.
  • Data that can not be shared across departments due to lack of data integration.
  • Difficulty for clients to get consolidated reports because the data is not integrated.
  • Programs that don’t balance.
  • In the consolidation of two systems, the merged data causes the system to fail.

Quality may be free but data quality does require an initial investment.  It takes people and resources to bring data to the desired pristine state.  If data is allowed to remain in its current (dirty) state, there may be a substantial cost and disruption to the organization.  Very few organizations understand the costs and exposures of poor quality data.

Impact Of Poor Quality Data

Data is an asset but it can only be an asset if the data is of high quality.  Data can also be a liability if it is inaccurate, untimely, improperly defined, etc.  An organization may be better off not having certain data than having inaccurate data, especially if those relying on the data do not know of its inaccuracy.  A hospital would be better off not knowing a patient’s blood type than believing and trusting it to be “O+.”

Which Data Should Be Improved?

It should be obvious that it’s impossible to improve the quality of all the data in an installation.  The prioritization is much like triage.  The energy should be spent on data where the quality improvement will bring an important benefit to the business.  Other criteria that would suggest data improvement is data that can be fixed and kept clean.  Unimportant data can be ignored.  Data that will become obsolete can also be bypassed.  Examples are:

  1. The business will be bought
  2. The data will be converted because of a new application
  3. A reengineering of the business will cause the certain data to be retired

If the Marketing Department is reviewing the demographics of their customers, the zip code (as part of the address) is important while the rest of the address is less critical.

There will be wide variations in the costs to clean different files and databases. This will enter into any decision about which data to purify. The cost of perfectly accurate data may be prohibitive and may not be cost effective.  Based on the source of the data, accuracy may also be impossibility.

Users of data may be willing to settle for less than totally accurate data.  Even so, it is important that the users know the level of quality they are getting.  A greeting card company asked their retailers to measure the number of linear feet devoted to that company’s card products.  Those who analyzed the data knew the data to be inaccurate but preferred inaccurate data to no data at all.  A large computer manufacturer asked their marketing representatives and technical engineers to report on how they spent their time.  It was well known that the respondents were not keeping very good records themselves and their reports reflected the lack of their concern for accuracy.  Those who analyzed the data knew of the inaccuracies but were looking for trends and significant changes to indicate shifts in how jobs were being performed.  The inaccurate data, in both of these cases, was acceptable.

Purification Process

To clean up the data, the following steps should be followed:

  1. Determine the importance of data quality to the organization.
  2. Assign responsibility for data quality.
  3. Identify the enterprise’s most important data.
  4. Evaluate the quality of the enterprise’s most important data.
  5. Determine users’ and owners’ perception of data quality. – Users will convey their understanding of the data’s quality and will often indicate why the data has problems.
  6. Prioritize which data to purify first.
  7. Assemble and train a team to clean the data.
  8. Select tools to aid in the purification process.
  9. Review data standards.
  10. Incorporate standards in the application development process to ensure that new systems deliver high quality data.
  11. Provide feedback and promote the concept of data quality throughout the organization.

Roles And Responsibilities

The creation and maintenance of quality data is not the sole province of any one department.  The responsibility touches Application Developers, Database Administrators, Data Administrators, Quality Assurance, Data Stewards, Internal Auditors, Project Managers, and most importantly, senior management.  The importance of quality data must be understood by senior management and expressly communicated throughout the organization.  Words are not as important as deeds.  When quality measures appear in performance plans, reviews, and bonuses, people finally believe that quality is important.  It is equally important that time and resources be allocated to development schedules to support management’s commitment to quality.

Impact Of Data Quality On The Data Warehouse

Bad data should never be allowed into the data warehouse unless the problems are recognized and acknowledged by those who will use the data.  Whenever possible, the data should be validated and purified prior to extraction.  If bad data enters the data warehouse, it may have the effect of undermining the confidence of those who access the data.  Clients and IT must be able to rely on the data, regardless of whether it is detailed, summarized, or derived.The effort to clean up data once it is in the data warehouse becomes a major and never-ending task.  It should not be the responsibility of those administering the data warehouse to clean up bad data.  The cleanliness standard puts an additional burden on the stewards of the data to perform validations of the source data.

Assessing The Costs Of Poor Quality Data

It will be difficult to assign real dollars to most of these categories.  If estimates in real dollars are possible, conservative numbers should always be used.  When an organization has experience with any of the following problems and if the costs of fixing those problems have been calculated, those figures can be assigned.

  1. Bad decisions due to incorrect data.
  2. Lost opportunities because the required data was either unavailable or was not credible.
  3. Time and effort to restart and rerun jobs that abnormally terminated due to bad data.
  4. In a buyout situation, accepting too low a price for your business because you cannot properly demonstrate your business potential, or your business seems to be in disarray because your reports are inconsistent.
  5. Fines imposed by regulating authorities for non-compliance or violating a governmental regulation as a result of bad data.
  6. Time and resources to fix a problem identified in an audit.
  7. Hardware, software, and programmer/analyst costs as a result of redundant data.
  8. The costs and repercussions of bad public relations due to bad or inconsistent data. (Ex. A public agency unable to answer questions from the press or from their Board of Directors.)
  9. Time wasted by managers arguing and discussing inconsistent reports which are the result of bad data.
  10. Poor relations with business partners, suppliers, customers, etc. due to overcharging, underpayment, incorrect correspondence, shipping the wrong product, etc.
  11. The time spent correcting inaccurate data.  These corrections may be performed by line personnel or by IT.
  12. The costs of lost business in operational systems because of poor quality data (data was wrong or non existent).  An example is the lost marketing opportunity for an insurance company that does not have accurate information about a client and thus loses the opportunity to market an appropriate insurance product.

Data Quality Feedback To Senior Management

Unlike measurements of performance and availability, the quality of data will not be changing daily.  Quality can, however, be quickly compromised by operating procedures that cause improper batch updates. Those responsible for data will want to make periodic checks to determine trends and progress in improving data quality.  The results should be reported to IT management and to the departments that own the data.

The quality of data can be measured, but before any measurement takes place, the following questions should be answered:

  1. Why is the quality of the data being measured? – The classic answer is that without measurement, management of the data is impossible.
  2. What is being measured? – Some possibilities include:
    1. trends, i.e. is the data getting cleaner or dirtier?,
    2. user satisfaction with the quality of the data
  3. What will be done with the measurements? – Some possibilities include: 1) focus on the data that needs to be purified, 2) provide a basis for cost justifying the purification effort, and 3) give information for prioritizing the cleanup process.

Summary

This column identified various categories of data quality, discussed how to identify data quality problems and how to address those problems.  The column gave suggestions for incorporating data quality topics in design reviews.  Roles and responsibilities were discussed.  Also addressed was data quality as it impacts the data warehouse and the necessity of bringing senior management into the picture.

Data is a critical asset for every enterprise.  The quality of the data must be maintained if the enterprise is to make effective use of this most important asset.  Improvements in data quality do not just happen; they are the result of a diligent and on-going process of improvement.

Source: EIMInstituted.org, 20.06.2009 by Sid Adelman read full article at Enterprise Information Management Institute

About The Author

Sid Adelman is a principal consultant with Sid Adelman & Associates, an organization specializing in planning and implementing data warehouses, performing data warehouse and BI assessments, and in establishing effective data strategies.  His web site is www.sidadelman.com.

Filed under: Corporate Action, Data Management, Data Vendor, Library, Market Data, News, Reference Data, Risk Management, Standards , , , , , , ,

Japanese regulator slams Citi AML systems – Stop Sales Operations in Japan

Japan’s financial regulator has ordered Citi to stop sales operations at its retail division for a month after the banking giant failed to improve poor anti-money laundering systems.

The Financial Services Agency says there are “fundamental problems” with Citi’s compliance and governance system, which is inadequate for monitoring suspicious transactions.

The FSA has publicly upbraided Citi in the belief that the US bank failed to catch and report money-laundering by a Japanese yakuza criminal syndicate.

FiNETIK recommends

Citibank Japan reprimanded by regulators (The US bank is punished for inadequate internal controls in the third such disciplinary action since 2001), FinanceAsia.com, 29.06.2009

The watchdog says Citi has not sufficiently carried out a business improvement order it was given in 2004, when it was told to shut down its private banking arm for similar failings.

The FSA says “control systems necessary for the detection, monitoring, and follow-up of suspicious transactions have not been developed” and that “despite the fact that it mainly relies on screening based on the database, input data is extremely limited; in addition, the database has not been updated since 2004″.

The regulator also slammed Citi’s management in the country, accusing it of a “lack an understanding of the rules applied in Japan”. Despite establishing an internal audit department, the bank has not accurately identified a series of problems.

The bank has now been told to submit business improvement plans by 31 July which should be executed immediately, with a progress update provided on every three months.

In a statement, the bank says: “Citibank Japan takes this administrative action very seriously and would like to express our sincere apology to our customers and other parties concerned. Citibank Japan is committed to implement all necessary measures to prevent any future occurrence of the problems identified.”

Citibank Japan operates in 35 locations and two Internet-only branches throughout the country.

The FSA rap comes just days after it emerged Citi has suspended loan applications at its correspondent division in the US after a review found some property appraisals and income-verification documents were missing.

Source:Finextra, 26.06.2009

Filed under: Banking, News, Risk Management, Services , , , , , , , ,

Counterparty Credit Risk Study Links Credit and Market Risk

Credit and market risk are linked, and should be managed consistently, preferably in one system, according to a study of counterparty credit risk released jointly by SunGard Data Systems and the Professional Risk Managers International Association.

The report, based on a global survey of 436 risk professionals, was the topic of a June 23 presentation at SunGard’s New York City Day, a collection of events held prior to the opening of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Technology Management Conference and Exhibit at the New York Hilton.

In a workshop on “What Happens Next in Counterparty Credit Risk,” Nawal Roy, head of the New York chapter of Professional Risk Managers International Association (PRIMA) and managing partner at Shobhit Capital Group, said that the survey of risk professionals from sell-side firms, buy-side firms, consulting firms and government asked a series of questions about the characteristics of a credit risk monitoring system.  In their responses, 67 percent of those surveyed said it is very important to have a combined market and credit risk system, while 61 percent said that issuer exposures should be monitored “under a hybrid framework.”

“Credit and market risk are linked, and should be managed consistently, preferably in one system,” said Marcus Cree, director for the Americas of SunGard’s Adaptiv business unit. However, he added, combining them is complicated, and “how this works in practice is an open question.”

Another finding from the survey, he said, is that in counterparty credit risk management, “perceived limitations are getting in the way of desired risk policy.” Systems should reflect exposure accurately, Cree said, and need to account for the whole portfolio effect and include risk mitigation such as netting. “Accuracy is important,” Cree said. “Simple proxy measures are not up to the job.

At the same time, he said, the survey showed that there is no “one size fits all” approach to counterparty credit risk management: “Fragmented limit structures are a reality, even if unified global limits are an aspiration.”

SunGard’s offering in the space, SunGard Adaptiv Credit Risk, is an enterprise scale transaction processing and portfolio management engine that allows users to perform credit inquiries in real time, around the globe. The system departs from the traditional “up front license cost plus annual maintenance” model that is commonly associated with risk systems, and is instead priced on a per-transaction basis.

Source: Securitiesindustry.com, 24.06.2009 by Carol E. Curtis

Filed under: Banking, Data Management, News, Risk Management, Services , , , , ,

Wall Street and cloud computing – Survey and Comments

The recession has spurred Wall street firms to investigate the use of new technology, particularly cloud computing, in a bid to overcome budgetary restrictions and skills shortages, according to a survey from IBM.

FiNETIK recommends:

Practise comment by Wiliam F.Gibson, 24.06.2009

When Cloud Computing Doesn’t Make Sense, NY Times 15.04.2009

IBM Demonstrates Cloud Computing Solutions and Record-breaking Low Latency Messaging Performance at SIFMA 2009, A-Team 24.06.2009

The poll of over 350 Wall Street IT professionals, conducted in conjunction with Sifma, shows that 32% predict cuts in their technology budgets in 2010, with 50% expecting them to remain the same or increase, a similar picture to last year.

This will contribute to a shift in technology use, with 46% of respondents predicting that cloud computing will force significant business change, up from 21% in 2008.

This makes it the top disruptive technology in the eyes of respondents, ahead of even operational risk modelling and mobile technologies.

IBM says cloud computing – where processing, storage, networking and applications are accessed as services over networks – has the potential to cut the costs, complexity and headaches of technology.

Ian Hurst, general manager, IBM Financial Services, says: “Firms need to capitalize on the latest technologies such as cloud computing to better manage all this data, operational risk modelling and analytics to assess it and turn it into market insight, and then mobile technologies to place it in the hands of the decision makers, wherever they are.”

IT spending on compliance continues to be important, with the survey revealing that systematic risk regulation, and risk and pricing transparency expected to have the greatest potential to impact technology spend.

Randy Snook, senior MD, Sifma, says: “Often clients or regulators will call our members firms about a trade that happened several months ago. New technologies will make this far easier. Cloud computing can allow firms to keeping vast amounts of data online indefinitely and mobile technologies can give brokers instant access from anywhere so that they can quickly answer such questions without having to pull out and search their data archives.”

Source: Finextra, 24.06.2009

Filed under: Data Management, News , , , ,

The State of the Environment of China in 2008

In 2008, China’s environmental protection system achieved great success in response to environmental emergency accidents caused by unprecedented natural disasters and in delivering satisfied environmental quality during the Beijing Olympics under the strong leadership of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council. Positive progress was made in such aspects as pollution reduction, construction of environmental infrastructures, pollution control of major river basins, capacity building, environmental economic policies and the three major strategic programs, marking a solid foundation for historic transformation of environmental protection.

Read official summary report by Ministy of Environmental Protection PRC in English

Inserted comments by  Charlie McElwee of China Environmental Law Blog

First, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council have made important arrangements for environmental protection under the new circumstances. At the mobilization meeting on intensive study of Scientific Outlook on Development and a training session for provincial and ministerial-level officials, Secretary General Hu Jintao made a speech and recognized, for the first time, ecological civilization as a major constituent of the master plan for the great undertaking of building a socialist society with Chinese characteristics. Ecological civilization was elevated to a strategic position matched by economic, political, cultural and social development, charting a course for environmental protection work in the new era. Premier Wen Jiabao and Vice Premier Li Keqiang also highlighted on many occasions that we should spare no efforts in pollution reduction and ecological conservation, combine expansion of domestic consumption with the effort to improve people’s well being and ecological environment so as to promote balanced and sustainable development. The first meeting of the 11th National People’s Congress approved the establishment of Ministry of Environmental Protection with the aim of reinforcing its functions ranging from coordination, macro control, to supervision of law enforcement and public service, hence providing stronger institutional guarantee for advancing historic transformation of environmental protection.

Second, the environmental impact assessment system has played an important role in macro control. We have been active in addressing the international financial crisis by making prompt adjustment in environmental impact assessment, improving the approval mechanism, simplifying procedures, honoring seven commitments, opening up a green channel to qualified projects while exercising strict control over energy and resource-intensive and heavy pollution projects. In 2008, MEP denied or suspended 156 such projects and of the 579 projects given instructions, pollution reduction measures helped to cut down 468,600 tons of SO2 and 38,400 tons of COD annually.

Second, the environmental impact assessment system has played an important role in macro control. [Not sure I would have placed this item quite so high given concerns about lax review of stimulus projects and the Jinsha River dam debacle]

  • 156 projects were denied or suspended.
  • Pollution reduction measures helped to cut down 468,600 tons of SO2 and 38,400 tons of COD annually.

Third, a breakthrough has been made in pollution reduction. The country newly added urban sewage treatment capacity by 11.49 million tons/day and 97.12 GW installed capacity with desulphurization facilities and shut down small thermal power plants with a capacity of 16.69 GW. Total discharge of COD and SO2 dropped by 4.42% and 5.95% respectively compared with that of 2007, a decrease of 6.61% and 8.95% respectively against that of 2005. For the first time the progress of our pollution reduction work was in keep with the timetable, laying a sound groundwork for achieving the target of the Eleventh Five-Year Plan period.

Third, a breakthrough has been made in pollution reduction.

  • Urban sewage treatment capacity was increased by 11.49 million tons/day.
  • 97.12 GW of installed electric generation capacity was installed with desulphurization facilities.
  • 16.69 GW small thermal power plant capacity was shut down.
  • COD discharges dropped by 4.42% compared with 2007, and 6.61% against 2005 levels.
  • SO2 emissions dropped by 5.95% compared with 2007, and 8.95% against 2005 levels.

Fourth, we have accomplished emergency response to severe natural disasters and guaranteed environmental quality for Beijing Olympics. Environmental emergency response was launched to cope with the snowstorm in South China and the unprecedented earthquake in Wenchuan to ensure the safety of radiation environment and drinking water. Beijing cooperated with its neighboring five provinces (autonomous region and municipality) for full implementation of measures to guarantee air quality during the Olympic Games, honoring the earnest commitment to a Green Olympic Games and completing the task in success.

Fourth, accomplished emergency response to severe natural disasters and guaranteed environmental quality for Beijing Olympics.

Fifth, steady progress has been made in prevention and control of pollution in river basins. Seven plans on water pollution control for the Huaihe River, Haihe River and so on have been approved by the State Council and put into operation. Ecological safety assessment on Taihu Lake, Chaohu Lake and the Three Gorges Reservoir area was made accompanied by full-scale eco-safety monitoring work, which paved the way for integrated management of lakes. We have launched a baseline investigation on concentrated drinking water sources in counties across the country, inspecting 15,000 source areas and urging over 4,600 protection areas to carry out rectification measures. This move further safeguarded drinking water safety for the public.

Fifth, steady progress has been made in prevention and control of pollution in river basins.

Sixth, environmental protection work has been unfolded in rural areas. The State Council held the first national teleconference on environmental protection in rural areas and put forward a set of important policies, such as giving incentives to environmental improvement in the form of reward and replacing subsidy by reward. The Central Government also set up a special fund for rural environmental protection, allocating 500 million Yuan to support environmental redress and ecological demonstration in 700 villages. This program generated nearly 1 billion Yuan local investment, benefiting over 4 million farmers.

Sixth, environmental protection work has been unfolded in rural areas.

Seventh, intensified efforts have been made in supervision of law enforcement. We continued the special campaign to correct illegal polluting enterprises and safeguarding people’s health. Inspections were made on hidden environmental dangers as well as urban sewage treatment plants and landfill sites. With mounting effort on expost supervision, we supervised 16,000 plus cases put on the rectification blacklist nationwide since 2005 and more than 8,000 papermaking companies inspected in 2007 and shut down 621 paper mills violating national industrial policy and total discharge standard. This helped to consolidate what we have achieved in this regard.

We have strengthened routine review and supervision on the safety of nuclear power plants in service, tightened regulation and assessment of nuclear power plants under construction or to be built and stepped up management of radioactive sources to ensure the safety of nuclear and radiation environment.

Seventh, intensified efforts have been made in supervision of law enforcement.

  • 16,000 enterprises have been placed on the nationwide “rectification blacklist” since 2005.
  • More than 8,000 papermaking companies inspected in 2007 [sic] and 621 were shut down for violating national industrial policy and total discharge standards.

Eighth, new achievement has been made in environmental legislation, policy, technology, publicity and education and international cooperation. The revised Law on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution was formally put into effect and environmental quality standard for noise was released for the first time together with emission standard for industrial enterprises and community noise. Active exploration was made on environmental economic policies such as green credit, green securities, green taxation and green insurance. Varied activities were organized for publicity and education on environmental protection and international environmental cooperation was developed in a more pragmatic manner.

Eighth, new achievement has been made in environmental legislation, policy, technology, publicity and education and international cooperation.

Ninth, we have further built up our capacity. The Central Government invested 34 billion Yuan for environmental protection, an increase of more than 10 billion Yuan compared to that of 2007. With the implementation of the three major programs for pollution reduction, we will build 363 monitoring centers on pollution sources, 36 automatic water quality monitoring stations and add 3,900 cars for law enforcement, creating an information transmission system linking national, provincial, municipal and county network and three data analysis platforms. The satellite for monitoring environment and disaster was launched successfully.

Ninth, further built up capacity.

  • The central government invested 34 billion Yuan for environmental protection, an increase of more than 10 billion Yuan compared to that of 2007.

Tenth, the three strategic programs are proceeding smoothly. General investigation of pollution sources entered the final stage for summary and release after completing such basic work as filling out forms, data input, quality control, data reporting and collection, examination and modification. Macro strategic study of China’s environment was basically completed and the major technological program on control and treatment of water body pollution was started on a full scale.

Tenth, the three strategic programs are proceeding smoothly. [What the "three strategic programs" are, however, is hard to figure out from the description provided].

Thanks to down-to-earth and effective work, the year 2008 saw obvious changes in some environmental quality indicators. The annual average concentration of permanganate index of surface water was 5.7 mg/L, down by 12.3 percentage points than last year and 20.8 percentage points than in 2005. It was the first time for this index to have ever reached national Grade III standard. The annual average concentration of SO2 in urban areas was 0.048 mg/m3, down by 7.7 percentage points than last year and 15.8 percentage points than that of 2005. It met Grade II national standard for ambient air quality. However, China was still confronted with serious environmental situation and the general environmental conditions were as follows:

First of all, surface water pollution remained very serious. The general water quality of the seven major waters including the Yangtze River, Yellow River, Pearl River, Songhua River, Huaihe River, Haihe River and Liaohe River were about the same as in last year. 55.0% of 409 sections in 200 rivers had water quality at Grade I~III national standards, 24.2% of them at Grade IV~V standards, and 20.8% worse than Grade V standard. The Pearl River and Yangtze River enjoyed good water quality, Songhua River was slightly polluted, Yellow River, Huaihe River and Liaohe River suffered from moderate pollution, and Haihe River was badly polluted. 46.2% of the 26 lakes (reservoirs) under national monitoring programs on their nutrition state suffered from eutrophication.

First, surface water pollution remained very serious.

  • The general water quality of the seven major waters including the Yangtze River, Yellow River, Pearl River, Songhua River, Huaihe River, Haihe River and Liaohe River were about the same as last year.
  • 20.8% of 409 sections in 200 rivers were graded worse than Grade V standard [presumably this means you could walk across the water segment].
  • 46.2% of the 26 lakes (reservoirs) under national monitoring programs on their nutrition state suffered from eutrophication.

Second, the coastal areas nationwide were slightly polluted. 70.4% of coastal seawater had water quality at national Grade I and II standards, up 7.6 percentage points than last year; 11.3% of the seawater met Grade III national standard, about the same as last year; and 18.3% ranked at Grade IV national standard or worse, down 7.1 percentage points. Of the coastal areas of the major four seas, the Yellow Sea and South China Sea enjoyed good water quality, the Bohai Sea had common water quality and East China Sea had poor water quality. The proportion of seawater at Grade I and II national standards increased by more than 10% in the Bohai Bay, Yangtze River estuary, Pearl River estuary and Beibu Bay compared with that of last year.

Second, the coastal areas nationwide were slightly polluted.

Third, some cities had good air quality better than last year, but other cities still suffered from serious pollution. The acid rain distributed in about the same areas, but the pollution it caused was still grave. 519 cities across the country reported air quality data in 2008. 21 of them reached national Grade I standard for air quality, accounting for 4.0%; 378 ones was up to national Grade II standard, accounting for 72.8%; 113 cities hit Grade III standard, taking up 21.8%; and 7 failed to meet Grade III standard, accounting for 1.4%. 71.6% of the country’s cities at or above prefecture level had qualified water quality, and 85.6% of county-level cities managed to do so.

The air quality in 113 major cities on environmental protection turned better. 57.5% of them had air quality up to Grade II national standard, 41.6% up to Grade III standard, and 0.9% had air quality worse than Grade III standard. 13.3% more cities had air quality up to standard compared with last year, and the proportion of cities failing to reach Grade III standard did not change.

Third, some cities had good air quality better than last year, but other cities still suffered from serious pollution.

  • 519 cities across the country reported air quality data in 2008. 21 of them reached national Grade I standard for air quality, accounting for 4.0%; 378 ones was up to national Grade II standard, accounting for 72.8%; 113 cities hit Grade III standard, taking up 21.8%; and 7 failed to meet Grade III standard, accounting for 1.4%. 71.6% of the country’s cities at or above prefecture level had qualified water quality, and 85.6% of county-level cities managed to do so.

Fourth, 71.7% of the country’s cities enjoyed good or relatively good regional acoustic environment, and 75.2% of the 113 major cities on environmental protection managed to do so. 65.3% of the cities across the country had good road acoustic environment, and 93.8% of the 113 major cities on environmental protection enjoyed good or relatively good road acoustic environment. 86.4% of the function zones in all cities met standard for acoustic environment at day, and 74.7% of them met standard at night.

Fourth, 71.7% of the country’s cities enjoyed good or relatively good regional acoustic environment, and 75.2% of the 113 major cities on environmental protection managed to do so.

Fifth, the radiation environmental quality across the country was good at large. The ionizing radiation level remained stable, and the radiation near nuclear facilities and equipment was within the normal range. The electromagnetic radiation level was also good. The comprehensive field strengthen in parts of several high-power radiators exceeded the national standards, but the radiation levels near other electromagnetic radiators were up to national standards.

Fifth, the radiation environmental quality across the country was good at large. ["Good at large" does not provide me with the level of comfort I'm looking for when it comes to radiation]

Sixth, some progress was made in ecological construction. By the end of 2008, 2,538 nature reserves of all kinds at all levels had been established across the country, covering a total area of 1.49 million km2. Among them there were 303 national-level nature reserves, accounting for 11.9% of the total. They covered 91.2 million ha, accounting for 61.2% of the total area. 28 nature reserves joined the “Man and the Biosphere” network of UNESCO, and 20-odd nature reserves became World Natural Heritage Sites.

Sixth, some progress was made in ecological construction.

Seventh, the environmental problems in rural areas were increasingly prominent, with aggravated household pollution, worsening non-point pollution, sharpening industrial and mine pollution, and hidden risk for drinking water safety. The pollution tended to transfer from urban areas to rural areas.

Seventh, the environmental problems in rural areas were increasingly prominent, with aggravated household pollution, worsening non-point pollution, sharpening industrial and mine pollution, and hidden risk for drinking water safety. The pollution tended to transfer from urban areas to rural areas.

Source: Ministry of Environmental Protection of PRC,  o5.06.2009

FiNETIK recommends:

Worldbank: State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2009

Filed under: Asia, China, Energy & Environment, Library, News, Risk Management , , , , , , , , ,

Fidessa Launches Global Analytics Platform

Hong Kong, 24th June 2009 Fidessa group plc (LSE: FDSA), the leading provider of trading, market data and global connectivity solutions, has today announced the launch of its new global analytics platform that enables users to conduct complex, real-time pre-trade, intra-day and post-trade calculations from multiple data sources. The analytics platform is available seamlessly integrated with the Fidessa OMS, program trading and BlueBox algorithmic engines, or installed with interfaces to any third-party trading, risk management or reporting application via a software licence.

David Sobolewski, business manager for analytics at Fidessa in the US, comments: “As the trading requirements of buy-sides become more sophisticated, the need for brokers to extend their level of service, and to measure and report their performance, increases. Building on Fidessa’s existing analytics capabilities, this new platform provides firms with the tools they need to deploy new analytics by leveraging Fidessa’s calculations, dataset or other data sources. Firms are also able to create new ways of marketing their trading expertise – for example, using alpha capture techniques to add significant value to the services they can offer their clients.”

The analytics platform enables users to take advantage of pre-packaged analytics including “Multi-listed VWAP Since Order Taken”, “Estimated Time to Completion”, and “Estimated Market Impact over multiple trading periods”. Alternatively, users have the flexibility to adjust the pre-packaged analytics or build their own customized, proprietary calculations within the analytics framework. The ability to offer tailored calculations on a client-by-client basis helps firms to differentiate themselves from their competitors, attracting new business opportunities while retaining existing business by providing greater transparency when working their orders.

Philip Slavin, head of European product strategy at Fidessa, adds: “This new platform also allows model builders to incorporate these analytic calculations into their algorithmic trading engines and smart order routers. In addition, the platform can provide real-time performance reporting and transaction cost analysis to the buy-side, and is built on an open architecture enabling firms to add new analytics programmatically.”

In addition to displaying and reporting analytic calculations, the platform generates alerts on outlier events as part of the workflow, and also provides traders with a single-view dashboard to facilitate the use of the derived data to enhance their decision-making process.

The Fidessa product suite provides integrated trading, market data and connectivity solutions to more than 22,000 users at around 630 clients worldwide, and serves more than 85 per cent of global, tier-one brokers.

Source: Fidessa, 24.06.2009

Filed under: Data Management, Market Data, News, Trading Technology , , , , , ,

SZSE Chinese bourse set to lure domestic flotations

With the market for initial public offerings opening up again, the scramble among bourses has started for the hundreds of Chinese companies planning to list to raise capital.

Small and medium-sized companies in China have in recent years opted to list on global exchanges. But now the fightback has started among Asian countries to grab a slice of the action – not least from China itself.

China appears ready to establish an equity market on its Shenzhen stock exchange for small and medium-sized companies, along the lines of London’s Alternative Investment Market (Aim).

Listing rules for the new market, called the Growth Enterprise Board, will take effect on July 1 but people close to the situation do not expect trading on the new board to begin for many weeks and possibly not before the national holiday on October 1.

Many Asian companies have opted to list in Europe or the US because of a perception there was greater liquidity in those markets.

However, many of the companies that listed on London’s Aim or Singapore’s junior bourse experienced poor analyst coverage and low trading volumes, which depressed the stocks.

The trend has now reversed amid a growing belief among Asian executives that they no longer need to list so far away from home to access capital.

Peter Alexander, of Z-Ben Advisors, an investment consultancy in Shanghai, says it is “just a matter of when the trigger is pulled” for the new Chinese market to be established.

Others caution that the plans are still dependent on investor reception of the resumption of IPOs on China’s main exchanges.

There are no official data detailing how many companies have plans to list in the new market but CY Huang, president of greater China investment banking for Taiwan’s Polaris Securities, estimates that there are at least 300 companies queuing up to be among the first to list on the new market.

Analysts say the new board should help plug a gap that exists in China’s capital market.

“For small and medium-cap companies, the only option now [for venture capital companies to exit an investment] is a trade sale . . . but it’s a long process,” says Cathy Yen, general manager of AsiaVest Partners, referring to the practice of selling shares/assets of a company privately to a strategic investor.

The new board will provide an IPO platform for technology and other small and medium-sized enterprises – Beijing policymakers put high priority on encouraging innovative companies.

China’s new market comes as the financial crisis is presenting a unique opportunity for other exchanges to challenge Nasdaq in the US as the destination of choice for start-ups, particularly among technology companies.

“Nasdaq has always been the first choice but that is starting not to be the case . . . now people are naturally forced to think about other boards,” says Tina Ju, managing partner of the Chinese arm of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the US venture capital fund.

That is largely because of the difficulties of pulling off a successful public offering in current market conditions. There have only been two listings in Nasdaq so far this year compared with 11 over the same period last year, according to data from Thomson Reuters.

China’s new market comes as other exchanges in the region eye up similar opportunities.

Japan now has its own Aim market. A joint venture by the Tokyo and London stock exchanges, it received its licence this month and is targeting about five listings in its first year although the initial focus appears to be on Japanese companies.

The Taiwan stock exchange, recently revitalised by the island’s warming of relations with China, is also aggressively pursuing listings by Taiwanese companies that had moved to mainland China.

Chi Schive, Taiwan stock exchange chairman, says that, while “Shanghai and Shenzhen are respectable rivals . . . for the time being I don’t think that threat is very strong [in attracting Taiwanese companies]”.

While Japan and Taiwan are only now gearing up their efforts, other markets in Asia have made similar attempts before – with little success.

Singapore’s Aim-style exchange, known as Catalist, has failed to gain much traction since it was set up in December 2007 to replace Sesdaq, the city state’s secondary board.

Catalist has attracted few new listings since its launch, which Singapore Exchange officials blame on the global financial turmoil.

Similarly, Hong Kong’s Growth Enterprise Market (GEM) attracted some initial attention but trading volume has since fallen drastically.

For China’s new board, there is concern over how many of the companies lined up for funds “are genuine, viable long-term businesses” says Fraser Howie, China stock market expert and author of Privatising China: Inside China’s Stock Markets. “Is the competition driving standards lower?”

For many, China remains “a gamble market”. While some companies can fetch very high valuations, “the question would be how sustainable this would be and right now we just don’t know”, says Ms Yen.

Mr Huang says the biggest concern for prospective listings is that “China is the one stock market where you cannot control your [listing] time-frame” because of the government influence over market operations. “In China, the biggest risk is policy,” he adds.

Source: Financial Times, 23.06.2009 by Robin Kwong Additional Reporting by Patti Waldmeir in Shanghai, Lindsay Whipp in Tokyo, John Burton in Singapore and Sundeep Tucker and Xi Chen in Hong Kong

FiNETIK recommends:

Shenzhen Stock Exchange General Manager Song Liping : to develop a Multi-Level Capital Market

SZSE:Shenzhen Stock Exchange president Song Liping’s Interview with Xinhuanet on the New Market venture board

Filed under: Asia, China, Exchanges, Hong Kong, Japan, News, Singapore , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,