FiNETIK – Asia and Latin America – Market News Network

Asia and Latin America News Network focusing on Financial Markets, Energy, Environment, Commodity and Risk, Trading and Data Management

China:Shanghai Stock Exchange takes new measure to build Shanghai into an International Financial Center

Relevant listed companies are required to follow the English version of “Rules Governing the Listing of Stocks on Shanghai Stock Exchange (Revised in 2008)” (the Rules), released by the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE). This is another initiative by the SSE to bolster the building of Shanghai into an international financial center.

According to an SSE notice on the issue, the initiative aims to urge the listed companies’ foreign directors and senior management as well as their overseas shareholders to strictly observe the Rules. In case of any discrepancy between the English and the Chinese versions, the Chinese one shall prevail.

An SSE official said that the new initiative, a material measure for propping up the construction of Shanghai into an international financial center, also aims to provide a better service for companies listed simultaneously on several markets in addition to the Shanghai market as well as the overseas investors by facilitating their understanding of relevant regulatory rules of the SSE.

Source: SSE Shanghai Stock Exchange, 10.04.2009

Filed under: China, Exchanges, News, Risk Management, , , , ,

FIX : The Standard that Could

As the global financial crisis hits firms worldwide, it will take longer for the FIX protocol to become a de facto standard in FX trading as IT executives grapple with where to spend their vanishing budgets. By Oksana Poltavets

It is nearly impossible to predict how long the worldwide economic crisis will last. Wall Street, The City of London and the global financial community alike have to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst when planning ahead and divvying up their shrinking IT budgets. Although some projects du jour, such as risk management, have received a much needed financial and manpower boost, other initiatives fall by the wayside.

The uptake of the FIX messaging protocol in foreign exchange (FX) trading may be yet another casualty of the cost-cutting battle in IT departments. When buy-side firms are faced with deciding how to allocate precious IT budget monies, adding or enhancing FIX capabilities might not make the cut. “With all the events going on in the market, FIX may be the last thing on their minds,” says Sang Lee, co-founder and managing partner with industry analyst firm Aite Group.

The worldwide recession is wreaking havoc not only on budgets, but also on overall global FX trading volume. Skittish investors have been pulling their funds back closer to home in an attempt to decrease their exposure to global risks. “Once the economy turns up, we’ll see more investment in FIX. We are going to need a return to happier times,” says Laurie Berke, senior consultant with analyst firm The Tabb Group.

In a move that observers say couldn’t come soon enough, the messaging standards group FIX Protocol Ltd. (FPL) has recently changed its development and release schedule for the protocol. For most of FIX’s history, it has been released in major versions. From the current version, 5.0, going forward, rather than making large protocol changes, the organization is instead restructuring this so that changes are implemented in small extension packs. An extension pack may add a new message, or it may add a single field, but the idea is that extension packs are smaller, granular, incremental changes to the protocol. Then the FPL will gather up 25 to 50 extension packs, bundle them together, and call it a service pack. This has already been done once with the release of FIX 5.0 Service Pack 1 (SP1), according to Ryan Pierce, FPL’s newly minted technical director.

Shift to Electronic Trading

The FIX protocol originally was not very applicable to FX trading, which is still done primarily on an over-the-counter (OTC) basis, with the exception of FX futures, which are traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). Earlier editions lacked the nuances necessary for the asset class. It wasn’t until version 4.2, which was released in 2000, that the FPL added FX support to the protocol. As standards go, nine years is a not a long time and FIX is still relatively new in FX trading, according to Mary Knox, analyst for Gartner.

Since the bulk of FX trading is conducted over inter-dealer or inter-bank platforms, as well as ECNs and individual banks, the marketplace was originally built on one-to-one connections. Banks and ECNs provided their own proprietary protocols or application programming interfaces (APIs) for customers to use. There is still no one single, consolidated location for trading in FX, nor is there a consolidated tape for market data, which initially made it difficult for electronic execution. However, volume growth and increased fragmentation of trading venues over the past several years have spurred the rise of electronic trading in FX. Last year, more than 60 percent of FX orders were executed electronically, up from 35 percent in 2001, according to an Aite Group report. The analyst firm predicts that number to rise to more than 70 percent by 2010.

However, only about 33 percent of all FX transaction occurred via FIX last year, up from 12 percent in 2004, according to Aite Group. By 2010, nearly 40 percent of all FX orders will be done through the FIX protocol. And although the need for a standard such as the FIX protocol was not as pressing as it was in the equities trading space, FIX has gained a lot of traction in FX over the past couple of years, according to market insiders.

FIX as a Standard in FX

Major FX ECNs have seen more clients, such as hedge funds and asset managers, asking for FIX connectivity versus the proprietary protocols or APIs they previously preferred. Although Hotspot FX ECN owned by Knight Captial has been offering FIX support since 2002, about 40 percent of its customers now send their orders in via FIX, according to Paul Reidy, director and head of technology for Hotspot FX. Similarly, FXall has seen an uptick in customers inquiring after FIX connectivity, says Minor Hoffman, CTO of the ECN. FXall started offering FIX as a protocol about two years ago when customer demand swelled. (For more on FXall and the fixed-income space, please turn to page 20.)

Not to be left out, Thomson Reuters hopes to offer full support for FIX across all of its platforms, new and old, by 2010, according to Richard Kiel, global head of post trade services at the vendor. Currently, Reuters’ dealing and matching platforms do not have a FIX interface, but client demand is driving the change. Still, Kiel says that a minority of FX orders it executes comes in via FIX. That is not the case for one ECN: Currenex claims that nearly 60 percent of its trading volume is done via FIX. Currenex, a subsidiary of State Street, has been pushing customers away from its Java API toward either a FIX connection or a proprietary graphical user interface (GUI), says Sean Gilman, CTO of Currenex.

Although the current economic conditions and the constrains of IT budgets have somewhat hampered the adoption of the FIX protocol in FX trading, industry experts agree that FIX will eventually be the dominant protocol in the space. The shift in power will most likely happen next year or even further out, depending on the state of global finances, among other things.

Added Benefits

No one can dispute the benefits the equities marketplace has gained from the FIX messaging protocol. Market participants want to apply those positive aspects to reap similar rewards in FX trading. In fact, much of the driving force behind FIX adoption in FX comes from firms trading in equities. ECNs are seeing many equities market participants who want to start trading FX asking if they can use their existing infrastructure, trading platforms and connectivity for the FX space. Clients who wish to trade multi-asset strategies that include FX are also looking to be able to use one common protocol. “Ideally, they want to standardize their infrastructure as much as possible and use as much common technology as possible,” says Hotspot FX’s Reidy. Even customers who were already using a proprietary API have begun switching to a FIX connection in order to consolidate on one system within their own organizations, he adds.

As with any standard, FIX brings the added benefit of stability and ease-of-use. Integrating new customers becomes much faster when using a protocol such as FIX, because the majority of the industry is familiar with it. However, in some cases, two firms can define FIX in different ways, which could cause discrepancies. “There’s always an element of customization required for every individual but if we can drive toward a common standard, that would make things a lot easier,” says Kiel.

Although the FIX protocol is used mainly in the pre-trade and trade areas of FX, the industry could also benefit from FIX adoption in the post-trade environment. Version 5.0 of the protocol has added support for post-trade services, as well as traditional capabilities. Back-office activities such as trade notifications and allocations can be electronically delivered via FIX. In spite of its added functionality, version 5.0 has not yet gained wide traction in any asset class. The FPL plans to release the second service pack (SP2) for FIX 5.0 early in the second quarter of this year. FIX 5.0 SP2 will include added support for FX non-deliverable forwards (NDFs).

Market participants have been using FIX in FX trading for years, but the protocol has not yet become the de facto standard for the asset class. The present economic pressures on technology teams and budgets at global financial firms have slightly slowed the uptake of FIX in FX. However, the benefits of adopting one standard outweigh the financial costs to invest in FIX infrastructure and support. FX is a rapidly changing marketplace, observers note. “If they were starting from scratch, FIX would be a no-brainer. But now there needs to be an incentive to make it work,” says Lee. “It will take time.”

Source: Waters, by Oksana Poltavets, 01.04.2009

Filed under: Data Management, Exchanges, FIX Connectivity, Market Data, News, Standards, Trading Technology, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HSBC Mexico Upgrades Its Core Banking Systems in One Big Bang

HSBC Mexico decided to upgrade its core banking applications in one shot, tapping CSC’s automated upgrade program to govern the implementation. To read full article click here.

If a bank is going for a “big bang” core systems upgrade, it seems appropriate to launch the new systems on July 4, even if the bank is based in Mexico and its customers don’t celebrate the United States’ day of independence. Before Mexico City-based HSBC Mexico (HBMX), part of HSBC Group (London; US$2.5 trillion in assets) went live with new core applications on Independence Day in 2008, it had been using a mix of legacy versions of core banking applications from Hogan Systems, which was acquired by CSC in August 1996.

According to Arturo Rivera Fermoso, IT director, core systems, for HBMX, the aging software prevented the bank from leveraging state-of-the-art hardware. “In some cases, the oldest applications within our Hogan suite prevented us from fully using the new capabilities of our hardware system,” he relates. “For example, we were limited to batch processing on some functions but wanted to move to all real-time and achieve 24×7 availability.”

Still, HBMX approached the possibility of upgrading the heart of its operations with caution. “Our core banking applications are mission-critical, so we had chosen not to upgrade to current application versions until the benefits of the upgrade outweighed the cost and risk,” Fermoso says, adding that the bank decided to take the leap in 2006.

Source: Bank Systems & Technology, b13.04.2009

Filed under: Banking, Mexico, News, , , , , ,

Shanghai Stock Exchange Governor Geng: Market Stability, the Primary Mission in 2009

The Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) has recently held its annual event of 2009 Press Publicity Symposium in the sixth consecutive year. SSE Governor Geng Liang and President Zhang Yujun attended the meeting and introduced the SSE’s major work in 2009. Fifteen leading media, including the Shanghai Securities News, took part in the symposium and joined in the positive and in-depth discussion on the stability and development of the SSE market. Geng stressed at the meeting that the primary mission of the SSE this year is to maintain stability in market development.

Geng said that the SSE has been keeping a good working relationship with the press media, and it thanks the media for their contribution to the development of China’s securities market. According to Geng, China’s economy and capital market will face both opportunities and challenges in 2009. We should strengthen our confidence in the face of challenges, maintain stability to overcome difficulties, and strive to do a better job by making greater efforts in the building of Shanghai into an international financial center as well as the development of national economy and China’s capital market.

Geng concluded that confidence comes from the following aspects. First, our national economy as a whole still keeps a good momentum. Second, the basis of China’s capital market is healthy, benefiting from a series of reforms on the securities market started a few years ago, including the equity division reform and the unremitting efforts in comprehensive governance of securities companies and improvement of the level of corporate governance of listed companies. Third, the confidence comes from the macroeconomic policies from the government on bolstering growth and expanding domestic demand as well as the continuous efforts by regulatory bodies on supporting the development of the securities market. Fourth, from the increasing trading volume, the investors’ confidence on China’s capital market is on rise.

Geng also emphasized that the primary task this year for the SSE is to maintain stable development of the market.

First, we should ensure trading security and smooth operation of the market.

Second, we must unswervingly push forward the construction of blue chip market. This year, the SSE will actively take measures to support the merger and reorganization of listed companies for improvement and optimization.

Third, the SSE should overcome the difficulties to further perfect the market trading mechanism with the focus on the block trading market by introducing an information platform for it.

Fourth, in terms of product innovation, the SSE will further the development of ETF, develop and introduce the SHSE-SZSE300 Index ETF in due time.

Fifth, more efforts should be made to enhance the construction of the bond market by taking advantage of the return of listed commercial banks to the exchange’s bond market.

Source: SSE Shanghai Stock Exchange, 09.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, China, Exchanges, News, , , , , , , , ,

CFETS-Icap Resumes FX Swaps, Forwards Trading in China April 2009

CFETS-ICAP International Money Broking Co. resumed broking yuan swaps and forwards last Monday, just over a year after it and another broker were stopped from broking them by China’s foreign exchangeregulator.

CFETS-ICAPis understood to be the first interdealer broker to receive a license from the State Administration for foreign exchange (SAFE). The license allows the firm to broker yuan-denominated swaps, forwards and cross-currency swaps an ICAP spokesperson tells Squawkbox.

While the firm received the green light to trade  non-yuan swaps in February this year, China’s regulations exclude brokers from trading on the country’s  foreign exchange spot market.

CFETS-ICAP is a joint venture formed in 2007 by ICAP and the China Foreign Exchange Trade System   & National Interbank Funding Center, or  CFETS the trading platform and clearinghouse run by the People’s Bank of China.

In late February last year, CFETS-ICAP and Tullett Prebon SITICO (China), a joint venture between Tullett Prebon and Shanghai International Trust & Investment Corp., were stopped from providing quotes due to compliance reasons. Brokers said at the time that they were operating in a regulatory grey area where the rules under which they could do business in China didn’t bar them from broking swaps, but SAFE hadn’t explicitly issued rules regulating how it was to be done (Squawkbox, 25 February, 2008).

Under new regulations, money brokers must post the price of all transactions publicly on China’s CFETS trading platform, and report the details of all transactions to CFETS at the end of the day.

Tullett Prebon SITICO (China) Ltd., the other money broker that applied for a license, has reportedly yet to receive it. The company declined to confirm this or comment.

Source: Squakbox 30.03.2009

Filed under: China, Exchanges, News, Trading Technology, , , , , , ,

SZSE:Shenzhen Stock Exchange president Song Liping’s Interview with Xinhuanet on the New Market venture board

SONG Liping, President of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) was invited to an interview by the Xinhuanet on 2nd April 2009. SONG Liping had a two-hour discussion with netizens and answered questions on supervision of the new market, relationship between the SME Board and the new market and other related topics.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission promulgated the provisional rules on IPO and Listing on the new market, which is to be effective as of 1st May 2009.

1. Question: What’s the significance to launch the new market given the current economic situation?

Answer: Thank you for your attention on the venture board. Under the current circumstance, the board is of great significance for ensuring economic growth, adjusting economic structure and enhancing job creation.

Firstly, the board is conducive to stimulating private investment and therefore boosting economic growth. As we know that the small and medium businesses play a crucial role in the nation’s economic development. The venture board not only provides leading venture firms with support in direct financing, but also activates private investment including venture capital and private equity. Secondly, the board supports development of new business models and helps adjust, optimize and upgrade of the industrial structure. Thirdly, the board can help create more jobs by promoting venture start-ups. As we all know, SMEs contribute significantly to job creation, supplying 75% of the nation’s employment. The venture culture will be crucial for releasing the dynamic creative powers of society.

2.Question: Is the board able to provide more financing opportunities for businesses currently under the shadow of the financial crisis?

Answer: The board can help solve financing problems for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which became exacerbated under the current circumstances. Relevant institutions including the central government are working hard to provide all-around financial support to them.

Our analysis shows that the financing difficulty for SMEs also stems from their intrinsic characteristics. For example, SMEs tend to feature less operational stability, under-developed credit lines and limited collateral assets. It is difficult to solve the bottleneck problems at root through bank loans or guarantees. Therefore it is up to the multi-tier capital market to provide SMEs with stable, long-term equity financing.

At the same time the capital market has a leverage power. Once the SME is admitted into the capital market, it gains access to a financial support system integrated through the capital market.

3.Question: Do you think it is the best time to launch the board?

Answer: I think the question involves two issues. First is it the best time to launch the board under the special circumstances and second will it impact the market? Actually, in view of worldwide development of venture markets, it is difficult find the optimal launch opportunity.

However current market conditions indicate a proper opportunity to unveil the venture board. First violent fluctuations last year have made investors more mature and rational. The risk of wild speculation is much lower. Second thanks to years of intense preparation and design effort, the venture board’s rules, regulations and risk-prevention measures have been much improved and more sophisticated. And the three decades of reform and development have produced a large number of high-quality, high-growth companies. Therefore I think time is ripe for the launch.

The venture board will not impact the market. A few days ago, Vice Chairman Yao made this point clear during a press interview. What characterizes the venture board is the small scale and offering size on listing candidates. As Vice Chairman Yao said, even if 100 were to offer shares on the venture board in a year, the total fund raised would be just around 10 billion yuan, less than a single large blue-chip IPO. At present, the A-share market capitalization is valued at 16 trillion yuan and daily turnover at 100 billion yuan. Thus in terms of liquidity, the venture board will not impact the main board. And the experience of the SME board also testified to this point. In June 2004 when the SME board was launched, the market was also depressed. However the launch did not bring serious impact on the market. Instead, it brought in fresh liquidity. As a result, the market became active again. Therefore I don’t think the launch of the venture board will impact the main board.

4.Question: What can we learn from the overseas growth enterprise markets to help with smooth development in our venture board?

Answer: Nasdaq is universally acknowledged as a market characterized by venture enterprises. However it was not called a growth-enterprise market. In fact it was an electronic trading platform. But it became a successful market for venture enterprises. Thus the SEC approved its status as a national exchange.

German Neuer Market failed during the technology stock bubbles at turn of the century. The failure can be attributed to its over concentration on the IT industry, compromising its power to resist risk. When the IT industry declined, the market had no choice but to close down.

Globally, there have been 47 venture enterprise marketsl. They are mostly successful despite a few failure cased. Many of them were created around 2004. AIM and Kosdaq are among the most successful. In recapturing their experience and lessons learned, we realize the importance of institutional design in warding off risk. For example, German Neuer Market’s industrial coverage was too narrow. Thus in the Chinese venture board, we must broaden coverage. Furthermore the venture board must attract high-quality listing candidates. We have fully understood these issues in our institutional design.

In term of industrial coverage, we must realize that the enormity of Chinese domestic market. Since 2005, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange launched a nationwide SME-fostering program, which revealed to us the plenitude of listing resources. Thus a broad industrial coverage in the new venture board is fully justified.

And we must not set reasonable standards of admission. In some overseas markets, especially those established around 2000, profitability is not required and only 24 months of operational history qualifies for listing. Our rules are stricter and require reasonable thresholds.

In some overseas markets, regulation is overly flexible. In comparison, we exercise stricter regulation over the de facto controllers, corporate governance and information disclosure. For example, actions will be taken against misappropriation IPO proceeds to projects other than those disclosed in prospectus. These measures not only conform to the natural course of development for venture firms but also the practice of corporate governance in the present stage.

5.Question: China launched the venture board during the financial crisis, indicating its strong confidence in long-term development. Does the board help with measures in response to the crisis?

Answer: I think it helps. China was affected by the financial crisis, and it is of crucial significance to launch the board at this time. In particular the venture board actually lends SMEs a helping hand in time of trouble, instead of adding icings on the cake.

Globally speaking, in 1970s, when the oil crisis triggered recession in traditional sectors and slowed the world economy, Nasdaq came into being in the US. With its customization for venture companies, it catalyzed the formation of the Silicon Value and powered a new round of economic growth.

After the Asian financial crisis, Korea launched Kosdaq, which stimulated venture enterprises in the technology sector. It also helped regain investor confidence in Korea.

Taiwan Province initiated the policy of Technology Island after economic bubbles bust in 1994-1995. Taiwan’s venture board also stimulated unprecedented development in its technology sector and boosted industrial upgrade and economic recovery.

Therefore, as the premier said, confidence is more important than gold. At this point, the financial crisis is not yet over. Global economy will remain in the doldrums in quite a long time to come. The launch of the venture board will be a strong support for efforts to fight the financial crisis and promote economic recovery in China and worldwide.

6.Question: what is the position of the venture board in the multi-tier capital market?

Answer: The multi-tier capital market refers to the main board, SME board, the new market and OTC market. Actually SMEs board is a part of the main board. It has the same offering requirements as the main board.

The new market is more applicable for start-up businesses, as it requires enterprise to be profitable for only two consecutive years instead of three years on the mai board. With other conditions, the venture board is open to companies with only one-year profitability. The venture board’s functional positioning, risk profile and institutional designs are also different from the main board.

7.Question: what kind of experience does the SMEs board feed to the new market?

Answer: The SME Board opened in May 2007, and it has 273 listed companies, which have witnessed rapid development since listing. Some companies, however, have seen unusual growth, such as Suning Electronics. The company’s scale, speed of growth and quality would not be possible, had it not entered the capital market.

We can learn a lot from its development. Firstly we had a deeper understanding about the urgency and necessity to support SMEs through the capital market. Our research shows that development in the capital market lags behind SMEs’ financing need. Especially leading SMEs in their niche markets are in an urgent need for a financing mechanism to power their speedy growth. Some software firms may not lack funding, but they need capital incentives to attract and keep talent. The capital market can provide both financing and an incentive mechanism.

Secondly training for listing candidates will be deepened and advanced. A lot of effort is devoted in this regard. We have provided training to over 5000 companies, thanks to support of local governments and intermediaries.

Thirdly, the four years of operation have confirmed the importance of strict regulation. As most SMEs are private businesses that went through complex situations during growth and many are family businesses, we find them often struggling with internal control and corporate governance. For example, some SMEs do not even distinguish between corporate funds between family assets but there is too much discretion in using corporate funds.

In response to this situation, we initiated the specialized management mechanism for IPO proceeds account. Sponsoring institutions are made responsible for firsthand regulation over appropriation of the proceeds. We also exercise strong regulation over the practice of major shareholder embezzling corporate resources. Strong regulatory actions will be triggered whenever signs of such practices are identified.

In 2007, when the secondary stock market was bullish, we prohibited listed companies from trading shares. Some did not understand such regulation, arguing that the regulation may cause them to lose an opportunity to expand corporate wealth. However when the market later fell in deep adjustment, they became thankful for the regulation

8. Question:How is the SZSE’S preparation going on? And what is to be prepared next?

Answer: The SZSE has been preparing for the board since 2000. And since 2007, under the leadership and guidance of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the SZSE established preparation department for the board and further analyzed patterns of development and experience of overseas market. We have also made thorough research on the conditions of domestic venture companies including their stage of development, the support they need and their risk profile.

The next step is to optimize what have been prepared. Relevant rules and regulations are to be released, training for investors, intermediaries and other involved institutions are to be deepened, fostering of listing sources to be continued and technology system to be optimized.

9. Question: As the promulgated IPO rule mentioned, the venture board should establish investor accession system, which should be compatible for investor’s risk-tolerance and fully disclose investment risk. Why should such a system be established?

Answer: Design and requirement of investor accession were set according to characteristics of the venture board as it has totally different risk and profit features from the main board. The venture board enjoys comparatively lower standard for IPO, which also means it is more risky. As the Chinese stock market is characterized by a large number of private investors as the mainstay of investing population, a threshold for admission is necessary. Investors are required to have certain risk-discerning ability and risk tolerance. Otherwise the investor may suffer unnecessary losses and intensify risk on the venture board.

10. Question: Are private investors allowed to participate in the board?

Answer: The threshold for private investors has not been decided yet. However there are many channels for investors to invest in the board. For an example, mutual funds set no threshold for private investors.

11.Question: What are the main risks of the new market that an investor should pay attention to?

Answer: firstly operational risks. Venture enterprises are less stable than main board companies in terms of operation.

Secondly, credit risk. Information asymmetry may be more acute than the main board.

Thirdly, sharp fluctuation of stock prices. As venture companies often feature small scale and equity size. Unstable operational performance may cause sharp fluctuation in stock prices.

Fourth, technology risk. Venture companies tend to have more technology risk as its technology has yet to reach maturity.

Fifth, risks from unsophisticated investing public.

Sixth, risks resulting from substandard services of intermediaries. We require intermediaries to offer their best effort and due diligence in their service. However some intermediaries may compromise on their ethical responsibilities, providing misleading financing statements, audit reports or legal opinions. In this regard, it is a challenge for sponsoring institutions to bring a truly qualified listing candidate to market. Thus intermediary risks are not negligible.

12. Question: What will the new market do in respect of investor training?

Answer: The Shenzhen Stock Exchange conducts the investor training in all aspects. The priority is to set up a core author group for investor training on the new market. First of all, we must understand what investors are interested in and what subsequent questions will emerge. We must be able to offer clear and to-the-point answers in a proactive manner. Therefore we will recruit experts from fund management companies, securities firms, venture capital firms and leading universities to write or lecture on rules of the new market, overseas venture markets, in order to improve professionalism and readability.

Secondly we will fully utilize communication channels such as the Internet, newspaper, TV, broadcast, books and hold a variety of events like knowledge contest, online dialogues, open house and onsite activities.

Thirdly, investor training will be timely and effective, easily accessible and understandable for investors in both content and means of delivery.

Fourth, training sessions on laws and regulations, business processes and risk control will be given to senior management and leaders of brokerage outlets in an effort to promote their service quality and capability. These training sessions will take the form of national tours.

Fifth we will launch national lecture tours of investor education. We plans to jointly hold professional and targeted investor training campaign in collaboration with branches of securities firms nationwide.

13. Question: How to prevent speculation during the first-day trading on the venture board?

Answer: First of all, let me explain the reason for heavy speculation on the first day of trading. As venture companies have relatively small share capital and small size of issuance, there is discrepancy between supply and demand.

Second, there is also discrepancy between offering price and trading price on the secondary market. From the exchange’s point of view, we must institutionalize measures against speculation. In fact we have already taken such measures on the SME board. When the stock price rises unusually high, the stock will be suspended from trading for 30 minutes to give traders an opportunity to cool off and decide whether such a high price is justifiable. At the same time, we will impose real-time monitoring on irregular quotations, especially frequent placing and cancellation of orders.

At the same time, market-oriented offering will be adopted. The China Securities Regulatory Commission is researching on reform on the new share offering system. On this basis, we will take further measures to prevent heavy speculation, especially at the very first day.

14. Question: How to enhance market supervision of the new market to prevent irregularities like market manipulation?

Answer: In terms of share price manipulation, we will raise the transparency. The pre-open mock trading will guide the investor in placing reasonable orders. And during the trading session, specialized staff will watch for price fluctuations and stay in direct communication and interaction with relevant listed companies. Once irregular price fluctuations are detected, listing disclosure department will be informed immediately to determine if the listed company in question has unfulfilled information disclosure responsibility.

We will also analyze the sources of orders that cause the unusual fluctuations and take appropriate actions. We have a real-time market surveillance system, listing disclosure department and membership department, which work in concert to engage in real-time all-around monitoring. If we detect signs of market manipulation, we will contain the practice and dissolve the emerging risk.

We will also analyze the source of orders that leads to the unusual movement of the share price and take corresponding measures.

15. Question: How to enhance the operational conformance and regulation of information disclosure for companies listed on the new market?

Answer: Firstly, corporate governance should be strengthened, including the responsibility of controlling shareholders and de facto controllers, enhancing the independence of independent director and the function of the audit committee.

Secondly, more timely information disclosure is required. The Internet will be utilized for real-time disclosure of information.

Thirdly, the disclosure criteria for provisional reports will be moderately adjusted in accordance with the characteristics of venture enterprises.

Fourthly, risk explanation will be more detailed, clarifying any question as it emerges in a timely manner.

Lastly, funds raised by listed companies must be used fairly

16.Question: How does the new market give full play to sponsoring institutions?

Answer: The sponsoring period will be prolonged. In this way, the sponsors’ responsibility of will be increased. In so doing, we will improve sponsoring quality at source. In this process we will strengthen sponsor’s continued guidance and counsel to listed company. The sponsor must conduct regular onsite inspection on the listed company as part of fulfillment its duty.

17. Question: What’s the delisting system of the new market?

Answer: The IPO rules for the new market require a delisting system compatible to the characteristics of the new market. The Shenzhen Stock Exchange plans to construct a multiple-criteria delisting standard including financial status, operational capability, business performance, distribution of equity ownership, assets scale, market liquidity, operational conformance and fulfillment of information disclosure.

18. Question: What’s your consideration on the board transfer mechanism of the new market?

Answer: Voluntary board transfer will be adopted for those eligible. We respect the listed company’s choice. However, we must realize that one of the reasons for failure in overseas venture markets is premature transfer. Some high-quality companies left before the venture board grew into a sustainable size. Thus these overseas venture boards lost momentum for future growth.. Therefore, we will take these issues into consideration and aim for sustainable development of the new market.

Source: SZSE, 08.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, China, Exchanges, News, Risk Management, , , , , ,

SGX to further increase SGXNET Capacity by 3Q 2009

To cater for growth in the number of corporate announcements in the future, Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) is pleased to announce today that it is increasing the capacity of its SGXNET infrastructure. This upgrade is scheduled to be completed in the third quarter of 2009.

The number of SGXNET announcements filed has grown by nearly half over the last three years. Since last month, SGX has already increased the capacity of SGXNET to cater to an anticipated increase in corporate announcements at the end of this month – when many companies are expected to announce the results of their annual general meeting (AGM) resolutions.

SGX anticipates a marked increase in the number of SGXNET submissions between 5 pm and 8 pm from 28 April to 30 April 2009. To avoid any potential delays in releasing their announcements, companies may wish to do so outside of these peak hours.

Companies may release non-material announcements at any time. However, where a company’s Board of Directors has decided that a material announcement has to be broadcast during trading hours, the company should do so only after it has obtained a temporary halt in the trading of its securities.

SGXNET is an Internet-based system that allows users to submit their corporate announcements securely to the market from anywhere in the world, using a security token. Its users are listed companies and their agents, as well as bond issuers.

Source: SGX, 08.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, Data Vendor, Exchanges, News, Risk Management, Singapore, , , , , , , , ,

SGX launches enhanced Website to benefit Investors

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) today announced that it is refreshing its website with a new look and feel and enhanced capabilities, to be launched on 8 May 2009. A preview of this enhanced website will be made available at www8.sgx.com to the public from 18 April 2009. The official site remains at www.sgx.com.

The enhanced website comes with improved navigation and a friendlier user interface. In addition, web users will benefit from a new robust search engine and efficient sorting functions in the price pages.

Key updated features are:

  1. Company All-in-One Page. From live stock price to recent corporate action and stock chart, this page provides users a comprehensive overview of the company information at one glance. Users of this popular page will be able to enjoy minimal clicks and easier navigation.
  2. Investor Tools. Six different types of online investment calculators are available to help investors with different needs:
    1. Investment calculator
    2. Financial calculator
    3. Profit & Loss calculator
    4. Extended Settlement calculator
    5. Dividend discount calculator
    6. Structured Warrant calculator
  3. Technical analysis tools. Twelve new tools will be added to the basket of existing technical tools for investors who chart and analyse stock performance to make investment decisions.

“The improved website reflects several enhancements which are a result of valuable market feedback coming from our user community. The significant investment made on this website is in line with SGX’s continuing efforts to strengthen its infrastructure and technology capabilities to meet evolving market needs and add value to our stakeholders,” said Mr. Muthukrishnan Ramaswami, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer at SGX.

The improved website underscores SGX’s promise to be a highly trusted marketplace, providing reliable and timely information for all market participants, ensuring a fair, orderly and transparent marketplace. In striving to do so, SGX remains committed to delivery excellence to its stakeholders and working closely with market participants to stay relevant.

Source: SGX, 08.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, Data Vendor, Exchanges, News, Singapore, Trading Technology, , , , , , , ,

SGX to offer faster access to its securities market and data

Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) is pleased to announce today that it will be launching a new access platform to its securities market and data.

The new access platform, SGXAccess API1, will offer latency improvements of more than 10 times, achieving up to an average of 16 milliseconds for order acknowledgments. It will be an alternative to the existing SGXAccess FIX2 solution, which will continue to be offered. SGXAccess API utilises OMNet API, the native protocol of SGX’s Quest-ST securities trading engine.

In conjunction with the new access platform, SGX will also be launching a new service called Securities Market Direct Feed, which information vendors can leverage for algorithmic trading. These vendors will be able to connect directly to SGX’s securities trading engine for delivery of market data that is up to 60% faster than the current SecuritiesBook feed, which continues to be available. The new SGX Securities Market Direct Feed will also show the full list of transactions and market depth of orders in the engine.
Both services are scheduled for launch on 27 April 2009.

“This new access platform and data feed will cater to the needs of all participants who want faster access to our securities market and data, including our growing community of algorithmic traders. SGXAccess API will be offered at a more competitive pricing structure. This is part of our commitment to meeting the expectations of our customers,” said Mr Gan Seow Ann, Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Markets at SGX.

This is the latest of SGX’s initiatives that benefit high-velocity and algorithmic traders. In May 2008, SGX launched its Proximity Hosting Service to provide traders with ultra low latency access to its securities and derivatives markets – making it the first exchange in Asia to offer sub-millisecond network access to its trading engines. This service allows SGX Members and their customers access to SGX’s trading engines more than four times faster than the normal speed.

SGX also upgraded its securities and derivatives trading engines in July and December 2008 respectively, offering increased capacity and trading functionalities. This was followed by an agreement between SGX and NASDAQ OMX last month to study a migration plan to GENIUM, NASDAQ OMX’s next generation platform offering ultra low latency and world leading performance.

Source: SGX 07.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, Corporate Action, Data Management, Data Vendor, Exchanges, Market Data, News, Reference Data, Singapore, Trading Technology, , , , , , , , , ,

SunGard opens GL Net hub in Sao Paolo, Brazil

SunGard has opened a new hub of its GL Net low-latency market data and order routing network in Sao Paolo, Brazil.

The hub, which is the fifth to be opened in the Americas, will provide international investors with access to BM&FBOVESPA, the Brazilian securities, futures and commodities exchange. Local financial institutions will also gain access to SunGard’s GL Net network of brokers, and be able to take advantage of direct market access execution services to more than 110 exchanges and liquidity pools.

BM&FBOVESPA was created in 2008 following the merger of the Brazilian Mercantile & Futures Exchange (BM&F) and the São Paulo Stock Exchange (Bovespa). BM&FBOVESPA is now Latin America’s leading exchange, and one of the largest in the world in terms of market value. By opening the new GL Net hub, SunGard will help international investors send electronic orders cost-effectively to Brazilian brokers via GL Net, helping them trade on BM&FBOVESPA and create new investment opportunities.

Cícero Augusto Vieira, chief operating officer of BM&FBOVESPA, said, “We view SunGard’s investment in its Sao Paulo GL Net hub as recognition of the strength of Brazil’s capital markets, and of the potential of this and other South American cities to become international financial centers. With the additional trading activities that GL Net can help us to offer our customers, we’re confident of attracting new members and investment to the exchange.”

Vincent Burzynski, chief product officer for SunGard’s global trading business, said, “SunGard’s GL Net hub in Sao Paolo will help provide our Latin American customers access to worldwide capital markets. It will also help to meet an increasing demand from our customers for local and international connectivity. Demand for new investment opportunities and the growth of electronic trading are leading us to invest in the expansion of GL Net’s reach, with hubs opened recently in Warsaw, Tel Aviv, Mexico City and now Sao Paulo.”

Source: SunGard, 06.04.2009

Filed under: BM&FBOVESPA, Brazil, Data Vendor, Exchanges, Latin America, Mexico, Trading Technology, , , , , , , , , ,

China: QDII Rules to be revised [Risk Fix]

SHANGHAI-It is not unusual for China’s regulators to err on the side of caution. The country began its Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) program in 2006, which gives citizens the ability to invest globally through specially licensed Chinese asset managers. It started off slowly, only allowing participants to invest in fixed-income products.

As those restrictions were lifted, however, the QDII program grew rapidly, boosted by regulations that allowed joint ventures with international firms. This, noted a report, Buy-Side Technology in Asia, released by Celent in January, will help drive technology adoption.

“The government has also resumed granting joint venture licenses to foreign firms, which will draw more international asset managers into the market,” the Celent report says. “These international companies will likely bring more advanced technologies and strategies that they will then share with their local partners.”

Even in this capital-heavy country, the economic downturn is making its mark. Standard Chartered Bank (China) Ltd. is currently under fire for low returns and for allowing unqualified investors access to QDII products. In reaction, the China Banking Regulatory Commission has indicated that standards for accessing QDII products could be revised.

A focus on risk management could drive technology spending, the report notes. “Brokerages have already been adopting new technologies due to their exposure to Western firms with advanced tools,” the report says.  “Investment managers operating in China also need to be prepared for increased scrutiny, especially in light of the risk management failures at Western firms.”

Source: Waters Online, 01.04.2009

Filed under: Asia, China, News, Risk Management, , , , , ,

Asia: Investment banking revenues down, but not out

Net revenue generated by banks from core investment banking transactions in the Asia-Pacific region is down 25% to $1.3 billion in the first quarter from $1.7 billion in the same period last year, according to preliminary data from Dealogic, which tracks financial activity.

The drop is less pronounced than the 32% fall in global net revenue to $8.1 billion, and the 45% decline in the Americas to $3.4 billion. Indeed, as the market share held by the US has declined, the Asia-Pacific has increased its share and now accounts for 16% of global core investment banking revenue — up from a 14% share in the first quarter 2008.

Nomura leads the Asia-Pacific core investment bank revenue ranking with a 14% share — the Japanese bank also ranked first in the corresponding period in 2008 with a 9% share. Banking revenues in Japan were up 5% to $542 million, accounting for a 42% share of the market.

The dull spot is China, with a mere $80 million in investment banking revenues year-to-date, down 83% from this time last year. The country’s share in Asia-Pacific is a tiny 6.3%, not much more than Singapore’s 6%. Hong Kong isn’t looking much better, with just $13 million in investment banking revenue in the first quarter, down 68% from the same period last year and representing just 1% of the regional pie.

In terms of products, it comes as no surprise that equity capital markets (ECM) are suffering, with revenues down 75% in Asia ex-Japan, underscoring how much issuance has slowed particularly in China, Hong Kong and India. ECM is down just 39% if you include Australia and Japan and look at Asia-Pacific as a whole.

Nor should it raise too many eyebrows that the good news is to be found in the debt capital markets (DCM), particularly in Australia. If you include Australia and Japan, DCM revenues are up 67% in the Asia-Pacific, and that number stays high — at 65% — if you exclude Japan.

Challenging Nomura on the overall IB front is UBS, which leads the Asia-Pacific (ex-Japan) and Asia (ex-Japan) revenue rankings.

Dealogic defines investment banking revenue as comprising DCM, ECM and M&A transactions, including Chinese A-Shares. When actual fees are not disclosed, Dealogic determines the revenues using what it calls “revenue analytics”. Industry experts we spoke to about these rankings say the figures on bank revenues are “directionally accurate”. As one banker put it: “Banks looks directionally right but the numbers are potentially distorted by one or two deals and mis-estimated methodologies.” While that’s a fair point, unless banks announce their revenues down to the penny (and why would they?) this is a useful benchmark and one used by the banks for marketing.

Origingal Article here

Source: FinanceAsia, 30.03.2009

Filed under: Asia, Australia, Banking, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Risk Management, Services, Singapore, Wealth Management, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fidessa certifies new Intel chipset for its market leading, high performance architecture

Hong Kong – 1st April 2009: Fidessa group plc (LSE: FDSA), provider of award winning, high performance trading, market data, compliance and global connectivity solutions for all tiers of the financial markets community, has today announced the completion of its testing and certification of the new Intel® Xeon® 5500 platform for the Fidessa product suite. As part of this process, Fidessa found that the new Intel chips offered significant improvements in speed and power consumption over the current offerings from leading manufacturers.

Fidessa’s products and services have long been the benchmark for financial technology suppliers, and are used by many of the world’s largest financial institutions. Fidessa’s reputation and proven track record for offering market-leading, high performance and low-latency solutions to these most demanding of clients is well established.

Philip Beevers, Chief Architect at Fidessa, comments: “To maintain our market- leading position, we always ensure we are at the forefront of technological innovation, and evaluating new hardware solutions from suppliers like Intel for our products is a key part of this. As part of our certification of the Xeon 5500 chipset, using the Solaris operating system, we saw our benchmark ‘trading transaction’ throughput test run twice as fast as on the current fastest processors, achieving a sustained level of over 7,000 orders per second. In addition, the comparatively low power consumption of these processors for this level of performance makes them an extremely attractive proposition for efficient and cost effective use in data centres.”

Nigel Woodward, Global Director of Financial Services at Intel, adds: “At Intel we have been focused on the front office trading space, and how our technologies can contribute to key functions across the trade life cycle. From buy-side to sell-side we see Fidessa as a leading service provider in this space, and hence to achieve these superb performance results on our new Xeon 5500 series processors is an excellent entry to the market for the new architecture – showing that it can have a tangible impact on trading profitability.”

Fidessa’s high performance solutions serve over 22,000 users across 630 clients globally and are used by 85% of the largest financial institutions around the world.

Source: Fidessa, 01.04.2009

Filed under: News, Trading Technology, , , , , , , , , , ,

The International Private Banking Study 2007

Download: International Private Bank Study 2007, Swiss Banking Institute

By the Swiss Banking Institute, University of Zuerich, by Prof.Dr.Theodor D. Cocca & Prof.Dr. Hans Geiger

Source: Private Banking Innovation, April 2009

Filed under: Asia, Banking, Latin America, Library, Services, Wealth Management, , , , ,

Brazil: Eyes All Over – April 2009

IXE Brazil Monthly Allocation-april-2009After months of increasingly disappointing data, last month’s figures seem to indicate that the worst may be over. Hopes are still weak, but the publication of better than expected data gave a boost to the markets. We expect April to be a very similar month. Every datum that comes above market expectations should boost the stock exchanges, causing new highs. However, negative data, which we still expect to predominate, will be a catalyst for the realization of profits. Therefore, our expectation is for another volatile month, ending at its starting point.
The start and the end of the month are the important periods, with attention mostly centered at the end. As well as the publication of various economic data, in the USA and in Brazil, we have the Copom and FED meetings, both on April 29. Over here we expect another interest rate cut, possibly as much as 150 bps again. Over there we expect a more positive announcement, but without a change in rate. At the beginning of the month attention will centre on the G-20 meeting and whether or not the US$ will remain as the international reserve currency.
Price negotiations could be the key to the local market
Negotiations to fix the annual price of iron ore now enter their fourth month. Buyers push for an agreement while the prospects for the world steel market have not improved. Suppliers try to postpone a decision until economic data show that the worst is behind us and that demand has begun to increase. For the Brazilian stock market, a lesser decrease would send investors into a party mode, seeing as the sector accounts for 15% of the index.
Petroleum also calls for attention. Having traded at US$ 40/boe, it now sells at above US$ 50/boe. However, if demand shows no sign of heating and reducing inventories, the price will take another downward turn. Investors are also eyeing the Government. Debate on whether refinery prices will come down increases. For this reason, we decided to ease up the participation of Petrobras on our April allocation.
We have also reduced the participation of electric shares in our portfolio. Our expectations are of a worsening in the performance of Gencos. The reason is simple: in 2008 there was little rain, which pushed the price of energy up. This year, apart from a much greater rainfall, the rainfall fell in the right places, therefore canceling the need to switch on the thermal electric plants and, consequently, the average price of energy went down. We are placing TRPL4 as a Sell. In this case it is not because of price, but because of our negative expectations in relation to the renewal of concession contracts.
Outperforming the Ibovespa
Stock – Catalysts/Fundamentals
BBDC4 – lagging, should publish results that are better than its peers
BPMN4 – lower multiples and should benefit from CMN’s resolution
CCRO3 – Lagging in relation to peers and is a defensive stock
CPLE6 – cheap multiples due to the ever decreasing risk
DURA4 – should publish better results than construction companies in the short-term
GGBR4 – increase in the price of long steel in Latin America
PETR4 – reducing weight, due to negative catalysts
SDIA4 – negotiations with Perdigão getting heated
SUZB5 – Price of pulp bottomed out, with long fiber beginning to recuperate
TLPP4 – 12% dividend yield
USIM5 – lagging in relation to CSN
VALE5 – approaching decision on the price of iron ore
VIVO4 –trades at very attractive multiples

Source: IXE Casa de Bolsa, 31.09.2009

Filed under: BM&FBOVESPA, Brazil, News, , , , , ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.